Adrian J Hare
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- NewLowell On. Can.
When I first got into hunting, I was all a-go for brand name hunting camo. I had some Browning, some Mad Dog, and I even bought a Rivers West jacket my second or third season.
Now I wear fairly 'technical' layers from MEC (the same/similar stuff that I trekked through the mountains, skied and snowboarded in for years in my teens and 20's), and a layer of Mil type camo over top if I feel the need. (Mine is a Drop Zone Recce Smock in Multi-cam).
That way I'm warm and dry, but the performance of my warm and dry isn't limited by a brand name that doesn't specialize in warm and dry, and my camo isn't limited by weather. It's much less expensive to put together a system like this, too. I sold off all the old 'hunter camo' stuff, though I still own the Rivers West. I just never wear it.

I definitely share your sentiment on hunting clothing, and may I add that camo is for yuppy hunters.![]()
Drab colours in fleece or wool will do the job. Hunted ducks, upland, predators and big game since the early 1960's without camo and bagged my limit. Key fundamental of hunting with or without camo is "not to move". You or others can take my statement as you wish, camo are for the trendies.Depends on what you're hunting. For deer species I agree, but for predators or birds it's a different story.
Most camo also has a soft outer layer for low noise. Mountaineering gear is generally very noisy, as is waterfowl camo, which is why I prefer a fleece type outer which covers all my hunting needs.
To say all camo is for yuppie hunters is a pretty asinine statement.
Drab colours in fleece or wool will do the job. Hunted ducks, upland, predators and big game since the early 1960's without camo and bagged my limit. Key fundamental of hunting with or without camo is "not to move". You or others can take my statement as you wish, camo are for the trendies.
Drab colours in fleece or wool will do the job. Hunted ducks, upland, predators and big game since the early 1960's without camo and bagged my limit. Key fundamental of hunting with or without camo is "not to move". You or others can take my statement as you wish, camo are for the trendies.
Merci!Your opinion and choice, wear what you like. I'll wear my "trendies", you wear your "onesies" and Stormy Kromer.
Don't get me wrong i'm just as cheap as the next guy but there's a time to be and not to be. I'm not saying that you have to go out there and spend that kind of money but you get what you pay for and something that fits you right without the bulk. You spend the money once and your done.
I spend a lot of time in the woods each year taking customers out and i see it year after year with them so for me its worth it to have.
Depends on what you're hunting. For deer species I agree, but for predators or birds it's a different story.
Most camo also has a soft outer layer for low noise. Mountaineering gear is generally very noisy, as is waterfowl camo, which is why I prefer a fleece type outer which covers all my hunting needs.
To say all camo is for yuppie hunters is a pretty asinine statement.

Merci!
I'll stick with my Stormy Kromer.................it keeps me warm while hunting big whitetails in the cold Novembers. No problem. I'm glad we straightened out the fact yuppies wear Sitka and all hardcore hunters such as yourself shop at MEC, Filson and Eddie Bauer. Don't forget to grab a Tilley hat on the way out. It's the mountain goat hunters' preferred headgear.![]()
Call me cheap but I could never justify spending $45 on a pair of their underwear... let alone $200 on base layers, $130 on a basic insulated zip tshirt, $200 on pants, $500 on an outer jacket, $500 on bibs, $130 for a freakin fanny pack or $300 for a back pack. I mean you're paying $2000 for your clothes! Worse than a woman lol



























