Who is "We"? Perhaps you should introduce yourself?
Any idea on timelines and price?
No sir, you are incorrect. We are not clamping the barrel during the installation process.
You might not be clamping the barrel but the rail attaches to the barrel at two points because the attachment points are pinned to the barrel themselves, if it doesn't affect accuracy then that's great, but I am just pointing out that most of the time not allowing the barrel to flex freely is a bad thing
Someone who will get $10 rails made and sell them as military hardware for $300+
I would not be surprised if a M14.CA copy shows up soon.
That little 3" piece of metal should be $40. It is made in China. Anyone that tries to sell that for $300+ should be sent packing. What a joke.
Someone who will get $10 rails made and sell them as military hardware for $300+. I would not be surprised if a M14.CA copy shows up soon.
No sir, a copy of this part is not being planned. It does not have the same utility as the T97.ca FTU.
For example:
1) Unlike FTU, you cannot field strip the rifle and maintain optics zero
2) Unlike FTU, it adds significant weight to the forearm (there is no net weight gain with FTU)
3) Unlike FTU, it is not an "optically precise" part, nor are fasteners double-locked with set screws
4) Unlike FTU, you cannot mount a scope
5) Unlike FTU, you cannot mount a red dot in line with the bore (you could use a 45 deg. offset mount for some red dots only)
6) Unlike FTU, it is unlikely to hold zero
The only functional component offered here over the FTU is the 6 o'clock picatinny rail, which would afford you the ability to add a vertical foregrip; a desirable option, one that is also easily installed with almost any length of picatinny rail. The poor planning and poor design that went into this part is not something we will emulate. Our next project will be a new Lower for the T97NSR that will be 100% compatible with our Flat Top Upper.
No sir, you are incorrect. We are not clamping the barrel during the installation process.
You might not be clamping the barrel but the rail attaches to the barrel at two points because the attachment points are pinned to the barrel themselves. I am just pointing out that most of the time not allowing the barrel to flex freely is a bad thing.
This above statement is incorrectly comprised: the FTU is attached to two stanchions that are already available on the rifle. Original barrel harmonics are not affected adversely, quite the opposite. The T97.ca FTU will improve the accuracy of the T97NSR, if you do your part. Here is a quick edit of a recent range target.
![]()
Thank-you for this comment. The T97.ca FTU is a complex, military grade part that enhances the function of the T97NSR at less than half the price of other similarly configured bullpup rifles.
Do you guys actually produce any parts that are used by a military? What exactly classifies something as a military grade part? Or are you throwing around buzzwords to make a sale?
No sir, a copy of this part is not being planned. It does not have the same utility as the T97.ca FTU.
For example:
1) Unlike FTU, you cannot field strip the rifle and maintain optics zero
2) Unlike FTU, it adds significant weight to the forearm (there is no net weight gain with FTU)
3) Unlike FTU, it is not an "optically precise" part, nor are fasteners double-locked with set screws
4) Unlike FTU, you cannot mount a scope
5) Unlike FTU, you cannot mount a red dot in line with the bore (you could use a 45 deg. offset mount for some red dots only)
6) Unlike FTU, it is unlikely to hold zero
The only functional component offered here over the FTU is the 6 o'clock picatinny rail, which would afford you the ability to add a vertical foregrip; a desirable option, one that is also easily installed with almost any length of picatinny rail. The poor planning and poor design that went into this part is not something we will emulate. Our next project will be a new Lower for the T97NSR that will be 100% compatible with our Flat Top Upper.
I sold him that light on flee bay. Thatz why he is happyThat hand-guard not for airsoft, design by a Chinese company called "Defender", they design to fit T95.
We will bring new design which design for T97NSR
![]()
![]()
Do you guys actually produce any parts that are used by a military? What exactly classifies something as a military grade part? Or are you throwing around buzzwords to make a sale?
Are you guys developing a lower that would offer some 6 o'clock rails and maybe an integrated forearm like the other versions of t97 I've seen some pics of? That'd be pretty sweet. Will you be able to install your lower without your upper installed? Lol call me crazy but I like the upper on the t97. I'd really like a lower with an angle fire grip and a rail though. I'd definitely be a customer.
Yes, the Blackfeather RS will be undergoing range trials in Europe within 2 months. Your second question; quality, precision, critical testing, operational dynamics, features, warrant, design intent, reliability.
You still haven't answered NavyCuda's question. What makes your product "military grade"? Are you saying the materials or design specs are per mil spec from some military who is requesting such a product? Of the five nations who apparently use the rifle(according to Wikipedia that would be China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, and Myanmar) which one is requesting this product? Based on your first response to NavyCuda, your product is NOT in service, it is simply scheduled to be "undergoing trials in Europe within 2 months". Which is odd, seeing as how no one in Europe is running a Type 97/95. TDC
The question was answered with a sufficient degree of accuracy to understand what was meant by our use of the term "military grade" as it pertains to our product. Trials are for the Blackfeather "RS," not the T97.ca FTU. Thank-you.
Milspec is marketing.....
M14.ca is marketing more then he needs to.
TDC the Blackfeather is for the M 14 and is not a T97 product.
Let's get back to discussing options and weighing out the pro's and cons.