I have posted quite a bit about these rifles over the years. Probably the best thread I started is this one:
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/759463-To-quot-build-quot-a-1970-s-style-Austrian-Army-sniper-rifle-%28pictures%29
I used to have three SSG69s. Now I just have one, and I am happy with that. I spent a few years trying different ways to turn an SSG69 into a more modern type of precision rifle. Ultimately I concluded that the design wasn`t well suited for that task, and that it was better to just enjoy them for what they are: a historical design which is really fun to shoot, very accurate for what it is, but something that time has passed by a long time ago.
If you want it as a historical-type of thing, with a Khales 6x42 and that kind of thing, do it for sure. You won`t be disappointed. If you want it to try and compete for `hit your own bullet holes accuracy` with a modern high magnification scope - go with something else.
Pros:
- very cool, military heritage, a timeless classic like an old Porche 911. Not something you see every day at the range;
- superb barrel - probably some of the best barrel life of any rifle, and accurate, and consistent;
- great feel, and relatively light weight;
- the Khales ZFM is an exercise in effective simplicty.
Cons:
- Parts support is not stong. Accessories barely exist;
- If you use solvents on the barrel, they will seep down and `melt` the plastic magwell;
- I`ve never had a problem with the plastic mags, but they do not inspire a lot of confidence compared to modern mags;
- Integral dovetail optics mounts are cool but require special rings, which are hard to find. Replacing this with the picatinny mount raises scope height... the comb of thestock is not adjustable, etc. The rifle just wasn`t made for big optics.
- You simply cannot shoot a 6x42 optic with a `German` reticle as well as you can shoot a fine crosshair reticle with 12x or more... in terms of trying to hit your own bullet holes. The Khales ZFM 6x42 is, however, really great for shooting things like orange clay pigeons (3.5 inch across) (or something bigger) at distances way beyond a hundred yards or two.
The SSG69 has rear locking lugs, which is really weird and unique, and unlike almost everything on the market including all the `new` (SBS-type) Steyrs. The only other rifle people bring up as having rear locking lugs is the Lee-Enfield.
My SSG69 with my AW308:
This is about the best I can realistically do on the average day of shooting these rifles with decent quality ammo that they like (I`m using 168gr BTHP with the AW, and the 155 with the Steyr. The Steyr really likes that 155gr. Steel match stuff). The difference is probably more the scopes than the rifles, but as I say, the SGG69 is just not made to be used with a big high magnification scope in my view. With the ZFM you have to sight the shots in to impact above the line. For accuracy, I set it up so that the line just barely touches the thick black circle. Best consistancy that way. The `modern` way is... obviously you just put the reticle right on top of where you want the impact.
The inside diameter of the big circle is 2 and 1/4 inch. The inside diameter of the small circle is 1 and 1/8. Looking at this circle through the 6x ZFM at 100m, the whole circle is about as wide as the centre post on the reticle. You really have to concentrate to get the same point of aim... and even then.
Big difference in the results you can get with higher magnification and a fine reticle like this P4F (unfortunately can`t get much of a picture of it)
If I were going to try and go `all-out accuracy` with an SSG69, I would get the picatinny rail adapter for sure, and then replace the stock with a McMillan stock for SSG69 with adjustable comb. I would use a one-piece mount (AI-style) on a 30 or 34mm tube modern-type scope with whatever magnification you want. At that point, however, you don`t really have an SSG69. You have some kind of basterdized SSG barrelled action pretending to be something it isn`t