I've seen guys excited, been shaky myself, and no doubt there are guys like your buddy. But on this station, its EVERY show and EVERY kill.
...
We must watch different shows.
I've seen guys excited, been shaky myself, and no doubt there are guys like your buddy. But on this station, its EVERY show and EVERY kill.
...
Full curl doesn't limit hunter opportunity at all, but rather would trim the harvest of mature Rams. I wonder if anyone would be vehemently opposed to that?
Without the real issues being addressed I think most hunters should be vehemently opposed. IF and it's a big IF, we do have problems with mature ram populations that are more than a blip in time due to tough winters or disease, why are we suggesting more restrictive regulations without screaming for the real issues to be addressed FIRST. Let's fix the primary issue FIRST and then tinker if need be.
And I love to suggest the full curl idea to the hunting community - you quickly flush out who really gives a crap about sheep.
.
How is that the baseline for who really gives a crap about sheep?
If someone could prove to me changes are necessary I would gladly give up harvest opportunity to retain hunting opportunity. Many aren't willing to consider it and there are various reasons for that imo.
We must watch different shows.
First, they give the impression that all big game hunts take place in 45 minutes, and that they always end successfully. This, as all of you know, is a load, but there are apparently a lot of people who are just getting into the sport who buy into it. Or at least I’m so informed by outraged guides whose jobs are made all that much harder by “hunters” who can hardly wait to knock something down the first morning and get back to someplace that’s within cell range.
Invariably, when someone kills something, there follow high-fives, hog calls, whoops of joy, and general all-around merriment.
To the hunter, I say: All you did, numbnuts, was pull the trigger. Without your guide, you’d be sitting in the blind scratching yourself. Why are you acting like a hero? Also, you’ve just taken the life of something that wanted to live as much as you do. Congratulations are in order, maybe, but show a little respect. Other cultures manage it; I’ve seen them.
Aside from that, hunting shows are fine.
David E. Petzal
I guarantee we do, cause I don't have it anymore...![]()
It doesn't define me to jump and yell for joy. This year both my son and I harvested a trophy each where a hand shake and hung were exchanged with a verbal congrats, which is quite traditional between us. Attention is mostly given to the animal out of respect and not to the person who harvested it.....but that is just us. I am a trophy hunter but the harvest of one only takes a microsecond and 99.99999999999% of my hunt is sitting on an old lonely cutline/forest fringe watching for deer movement, listening to squirrels, watching ruffed grouse, etc. This year I did not fill my whitetail tags (Alberta/Saskatchewan) but I had a wonderful and successful year/time and that is what it is like as a trophy hunter, for me that is. As a trophy hunter I allowed many immature bucks and does survive. Maybe the CBC journalist should investigate a little deeper into a trophy hunter prior to negative comments about trophy hunting.Nor have I but does that make it wrong? Maybe it's you and me giving hunters a bad name...food for thought.
Maybe the CBC journalist should investigate a little deeper into a trophy hunter prior to negative comments about trophy hunting.
In fairness it was a CP story and there was no negative press on trophy hunters...it was the comments that followed.
CP? Sorry what does that stand for?
If you want to get your blood pressure up, read some of the comments on the CBC page today. Why is it that trophy hunters have such a poor image and that there are so many myths about what trophy hunting entails, even among the hunting community itself? Are we really doing that poor of a job portraying what it is we actually do? We eat the meat, we have virtually no impact on game populations, we contribute significantly both monetarily and with volunteer time to conservation yet we are portrayed as the villains of hunting. I don't get it. http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/bighorn-sheep-shrinking-due-to-hunters-study-suggests-1.2459623
Wow this has become a long thread with all kinds of commentary. I wonder how many posters actually went to the link and read the article.
Mountain...Mole hill
The article was reasonable and I didn't see anything too offensive in the comments. I generally don't feel reading a few comments shows any kind of overview of what the public thinks on a subject anyway.
in my opinion the term "trophy hunting" paints a bad picture.
the main picture being just hunting for the horns and not using the meat.
be this true or not it is the picture the term paints.
where as being a "meat hunter" paints a picture of obtaining food and not bravado.
perhaps those in to trophy hunting need to consider how to re-brand themselves with less emphasis on "trophy" and more on the good this type of selective hunting does..



























