Ya I wonder too. I saw a 696 (5 shot 44 spec) L frame stubby years ago and there was not a lot of metal on the outside of the cylinders (if that is even a rough proxy for frame strength). Given the N frame isnt up to steady diet of factory 44mag cant see the L frame handling that either. I have never heard of issues with 357 in the L frame though. What did you hear?...hmm, I wonder how an L frame holds up if it's fed a steady diet of full house .44 mag? Smith's other .44's are N frames are they not? I thought an L frame was suited for .38/.357 mag {and they had issue with the .357 stretching that frame}
...hmm, I wonder how an L frame holds up if it's fed a steady diet of full house .44 mag? Smith's other .44's are N frames are they not? I thought an L frame was suited for .38/.357 mag {and they had issue with the .357 stretching that frame}
I believe you are confusing the L frame with the K frame. The K frame (Model 19, 66, etc.) had durability issues that were addressed with the L frame series. Not so much with frame stretching, but from flame cutting and erosion in the top strap & forcing cone if memory serves.
, although I do recall expansion issues (frame stretch) as well as flame cutting on the K frame. Do N frames have an issue with Full house .44?I believe the 4.25" is for California, not us. We're just the beneficiaries (gag) of that change.



























