As a new shooter, any particular reason the 300 WM was chosen over the 30-06? If you have not shot either of them, the one thing that is absent from tables and charts is the fact that the 300 WM has a bit of a whallup in the recoil, particularly with lighter rifles. I got wrapped up in a sales pitch about 30 years ago when I was young and stupid, and bought a nice 300 wm. Hated it over my 30-06, particularly since it was a lighter rifle. I found that in the field, my shots were not much longer than 200 yards, so was a complete waste, other than the flatter trajectory. Sold it.
I own a Savage and have sold off any others that I have, except my Predator Max1 in 243, as it is a tack driver. I still hate the looks and those damn magazines. They are a frustratingly annoying contraptions. If I could find another 243 that could shoot as well as this rifle, it would be sold in a heartbeat! I actually think that this rifle is a complete fluke, as it really does shoot that well.
If I were starting off again, now that I'm much older and a little more wiser, I would be taking the advice of many who have written before me. The Weatherby S2 is a really nice offering, as is a Remington. Up a notch in price, then you get into the Winny's, CZ, Browning, Tikka and Sako A7.
On the EE right now is a decent, albeit a tad overpriced in my opinion, new Parker Hale Mauser 98 platform in 30-06, lots of other 30-06's and a Winny Sporter in 300 wm for $650. Good deals to be had, that's for sure.