Ok I hear this all the time in the motorcycle world. Ie so many people tell me they want a super sport because they will outgrow something to fast. this idea of outgrowing the rifle to me is total BS, same with bikes. Ie most people who buy a small bike and then sell it 3 months later saying they have maxed it out are totally wrong and are generally not that good. Example is I have used a cbr125 (TINY BIKE) on the track and whooped 600 bikes. Basically I consider the advice, go bigger now/ that you will outgrow something FAST as total junk.
Same with the 22. Sure in a few years you will want something bigger, bigger toys and sorting you can hunt with. But you can always bring out the old fun 22 and just go pinking/targeting. You will be able to use it for just fun as well as just practice. and in some cases even hunting. You never outgrow something as such, you just expand into more toys. But you will generally also still enjoy the old toy. I just hate the idea of shooting/riding something small to learn then quickly saying I have outgrown it as odds are you have not even remotely reached that toys potential.
Sorry, I didn't necessarily mean that I would physically or practically speaking outgrow the gun. More the term that soon enough I'd want to move on to something a bit more... adventurous (good word!). My original idea is to start with the 22LR, since it's a cheap entry level option, and the ammo is about as cheap as you can get, so I can go through a good amount of rounds and become more familiar with the rifle scene without diving in waist deep. Could I spend $500 on a Savage Mark II, sure! Is it a great rifle? Sure! Am I going to want to store it in the cage in favor of something bigger and more powerful? I have no clue.
I'm just looking to get into the sport, and with another kid due in April, and a ton of home reno's on my honey-do list, in addition to travelling for work, I just don't know how much opportunity I will get to go to the range, so for my personal situation, I'd like to keep the initial investment on the lower side this time around.
I totally agree with you on the idea that once I feel like I've mastered something, I'm only scratching the surface of my potential. I choose not never stop learning! And some times there is no point in wasting money on the cheap stuff. That's why I came on here though. Seems like for the most part, even a cheaper priced 22LR will be fine for my needs at this point. But by that analogy, a Ducatti Monster is not a good starter bike, and if that's your ultimate goal, then purchasing the best 125cc bike money can buy won't make a lick of difference in the long run if you don't spend enough time learning how to use it!
Who knows though, maybe I'll find a good deal on a used 22LR that I can't pass up!
Regarding the Lee Enfield, all the power to you! However you might find them a bit too expensive, given their rise in popularity.
Check out the milsurp forum to get the skinny on all the old collectables. Rifles like the Mosin Nagant and the SVT40 are reasonably priced and relatively cheap to shoot in the .30 caliber class.
Post war favourites include the Norinco M305 (M-14) and the SKS. The sks came out in '45 so I'll let others debate whether they're pre or post WW2, I'll just focus on taking them to the range!
Other than a 22LR that my grandparents took me shooting with once in my life, a Lee Enfield was the only other gun I ever handled, unloaded when I was younger (not that I've handled a bunch since then). It's always seemed like something I'd like to fire. I see them going used for $250 ~ $350 in decentish condition. Is that what is considered expensive these days?


















































