heavenIsAlie
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Abbotsford
no issues or holes in our ranges and we dont require a training course to use a holster.
Could not agree more, however many folks don't know when drawing or holstering how not to sweep themselves or others. It doesn't harmlessly jump in to the holster by itself. Once in the holster it is harmless, it's getting it there that is the problem for some people.The 2 best and safest places for a handgun are in your hand and in your holster.
Scott
Could not agree more, however many folks don't know when drawing or holstering how not to sweep themselves or others. It doesn't harmlessly jump in to the holster by itself. Once in the holster it is harmless, it's getting it there that is the problem for some people.
I don't want to start a purse fight, but do me a favour. Count the number of holes in the benches and ceiling baffles at your pistol range, and get back to me.
This part always bugged me. Qualified by whom? How hard is it to put a gun in a holster? If I am qualified to own a restricted, I am qualified to wear one in a holster. This is just another example of one select group of firearms owners screwing over another. Join our little club or you don't get to wear your pistol on your belt.
I'm always amazed at how dumb some Ontarians are - the entire rest of the country reports no real issues without a holster course (and a whole bunch of other officious sounding crap) but an apparently large section of the Ontario community unleashes mayhem by using a holster without first being "qualified".
Here we go again.
Yup, folks insisting on unnecessary crap to make the CFO feel better. I've been using holsters for 25 years, and I've never been a member of a club that requires a holster course (neither of the clubs I'm currently a member of require such a course), and I've never been a member of a club where a civilian negligently discharged a pistol causing injury. I have been a member of 3 clubs where LEO's ND a pistol from the holster, causing injury, however. I believe that due to the general conservatism of our sport, there's a psychological need to create an 'elite' group within the group - and that that is poisonous for the long term future of shooting.
I'm always amazed at how dumb some Ontarians are - the entire rest of the country reports no real issues without a holster course (and a whole bunch of other officious sounding crap) but an apparently large section of the Ontario community unleashes mayhem by using a holster without first being "qualified".
ONtario is full of people who believe you can never get enough training....its quite annoying sometimes. The natural progression of this logic is that everyone pays the price for the errors of one or two
what really boggles my mind is that biggest proponents of more training and more testing are those who shoot in the states....so, basically, they refuse to shoot around/with untrained individuals at their home club, but when in the US it doesn't matter so much.
Mr. Onagoth,
I might be one of those people you are referring to as regards shooting in the US. It's true that I shoot more down here than I do at home just because there's so much more available here within 15 minutes of where I live.
I'm quite satisfied with the "training" I got in Canada and particularly happy that I got my Black Badge. When I talk about supporting mandatory training, it's from the perspective of someone that regularly sees the result of selling handguns to any one that can breathe with no training whatsoever. My opinion changes when it comes to people that compete because the process of practicing with experienced and safe shooters and then shooting in the matches under carefully controlled conditions helps to create safe shooters because of the mentoring that goes on constantly.
I shoot a match here every week in one of the disciplines including USPSA. Those matches never concern me because, the safety rules are identical to those in IPSC at home. The games also include a lot of military people here and they are solid.
All that changes when you go to a public range where many of the people have no exposure to good gun handling. The Texas Concealed Carry course is just four hours now and that's all you need to carry. That is the only mandated training and much of that four hours has little to do with skills or safety. No holster work, no time spent on malfunctions and in many cases all the range time is in a booth at an indoor range with the bulk of the required rounds being at less than 15 yards into a wall sized silhouette target. Even at that, all you need is 70% as I recall.
Even if all you remember is ACT/PROVE from the initial courses and tests, that's better than what most people get down here unless they are motivated and take training at their own cost.
Even if you go to a club range in Canada, you know that people on the line have done enough to get their RPAL if you are shooting restricted and many have had to take the club safety courses with some time in live fire under supervision.
Herc
If you shoot USPSA regularly with no concerns, I might be inclined to think that your belief is that the BB shouldn't be required. After all, you have no concerns at USPSA matches right? Those don't require any holster safety course or BB.
This part always bugged me. Qualified by whom? How hard is it to put a gun in a holster? If I am qualified to own a restricted, I am qualified to wear one in a holster. This is just another example of one select group of firearms owners screwing over another. Join our little club or you don't get to wear your pistol on your belt.
If you shoot USPSA regularly with no concerns, I might be inclined to think that your belief is that the BB shouldn't be required. After all, you have no concerns at USPSA matches right? Those don't require any holster safety course or BB.