Alfa-Proj Revolvers In Stock

Wolverine Supplies Sales

Wolverine Supplies Sales

Business Member Rep
For more info check out our website:

http://www.wolverinesupplies.com/products.aspx?searchTerm=alfa&v=1

alfa_zps9728bd84.jpg
 
I like the 6" .357 Magnum. Is that an adjustable rear sight on it? What else can you tell us about these, they are Czech made. How is the fit and finish on these? Any range reports from you staff shooting any of these?
 
I've had my Alpha Project 9mm 9261 for a couple of weeks now and really liking it. This is my first double action revolver though, so my frame of reference is not that large. Have posted a review and some updates here http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/1032008-Project-Alpha-Model-9261-Review-Updated-with-Picks-of-the-Trigger-Mechisms

Net is this is a great value revolver. Pretty good out of the box, really solid, accurate, and if you like to tinker - the trigger pull (S/A & D/A) can be improved quite a bit. Now if they would just make one in 45 acp ....

samsplacci71 said:
I like the 6" .357 Magnum. Is that an adjustable rear sight on it? What else can you tell us about these, they are Czech made. How is the fit and finish on these? Any range reports from you staff shooting any of these?
Click to expand...
 
45acp and id already have sent my $$. I can't justify buying a revolver and stocking another calibre. Don't want a revolver in 9mm... so 45acp it would have to be but that would be a beast of a revolver.
 
I think I will buy that 9mm soon. will you have any more in stock in the future (only see 1)???
 
Got my 357 mag - 6 in yesterday.

Nice revolver. Even a target with the range test. Very satisfied.

Do you think you will have some in .45ACP
 
The frame on my 9261 9mm revolver appears to be investment cast in steel. Pretty happy with the overall fit and finish.
 
Just picked up the Alfa 2251 all steel .22lr . Really impressed so far , quality fit and finish seems somewhere between Ruger and S&W . Compared to a Ruger SP101 side by side the Alfa is the winner , better single and double action trigger and overall fit, seems to be more accurate too . Also love how Czech made guns are zeroed perfectly and come with test targets , my test target is one ragged 9 shot hole at 15M . Only thing i dont like are the factory rubber grips , easy upgrade though.
 
Bump on this only to say I just took possession of the 251C, 22LR Blued Alloy model and I could not be happier with the fit and finish. Solid construction all things considering.

The included 15 yard accuracy target is comforting as well.

Would definitely recommend, based on that alone. Will update once I get a chance to get it to the range to test further.
 
Bump to an old thread.

Very interested in getting a 9251 9mm in stainless but confused as to the difference between the 9251 and 9251C (Classic).

The obvious seems to be that the 9251 has the smaller cylindar with a gap at the front of it. Does anyone know how this differs from the 9251 Classic model without the gap?

Cheers!
 
The bullet will pass into the rifled barrel quicker with the short cylinder, and the 4.5 inch barrel will be set back to meet the shorter cylinder reducing the overall length of the firearm by about a half inch. Basically the 4.5" with the short cylinder and setback barrel will be the same size as a typical 4" revolver.
 
Can-down said:
The bullet will pass into the rifled barrel quicker with the short cylinder, and the 4.5 inch barrel will be set back to meet the shorter cylinder reducing the overall length of the firearm by about a half inch. Basically the 4.5" with the short cylinder and setback barrel will be the same size as a typical 4" revolver.
Click to expand...

Thanks for that info!

Are there any other practical differences besides the overal length of the pistol? Pros/cons?

I've personally handled the shorter barreled version and it feels great, but (not that it means much) the aesthetic of the big gap in front of the cylinder looks kind of strange.
and it seems as if the lack of fluting on the non-Classic model's cylinder might be a drawback as far as hand rotation of the cylinder.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom