Anyone tested out their LCW 7.62x39 HP ammo yet?

G.Mitchell

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
I am just wondering if anyone here has done any ballistic testing on the new LCW 7.62x39 HP ammo?

I am interested in it but would like to see some form of ballistic testing first.

7.62x39 HP ammo typically isn't a true expanding HP.

Has anyone done any testing?

If not is anyone interested in seeing any ballistic testing done on this load?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
I am just wondering if anyone here has done any ballistic testing on the new LCW 7.62x39 HP ammo?

I am interested in it but would like to see some form of ballistic testing first.

7.62x39 HP ammo typically isn't a true expanding HP.

Has anyone done any testing?

If not is anyone interested in seeing any ballistic testing done on this load?

Thanks
You asked about ballistics testing 4 times, I'm sure everyone understood the first time :HR: f:P:
 
You asked about ballistics testing 4 times, I'm sure everyone understood the first time :HR: f:P:

What? Not sure what you think you are adding here, but I feel this is a valid question. Only info I heard so far is yes it expands in clay.

I find ballistics and how a bullet performs to be both interesting and critical in a purchase that may be used for hunting and more. I am sure others are interested as well. I can't be the only one that wants to know how this ammo performs.
 
What? Not sure what you think you are adding here, but I feel this is a valid question. Only info I heard so far is yes it expands in clay.

I find ballistics and how a bullet performs to be both interesting and critical in a purchase that may be used for hunting and more. I am sure others are interested as well. I can't be the only one that wants to know how this ammo performs.

f:P:
 
You asked about ballistics testing 4 times, I'm sure everyone understood the first time :HR: f:P:

Oh great! Another person who likes to start a forum fight for no good reason.

I too, am interested with replies to this info. I think most people do not give a crap about spelling or grammar.
 

To answer your question OP, yes I would be interested in a review of the performance of this ammunition.

In other words, I would enjoy seeing a ballistic test of this load.

To put it another way, a ballistic test would be interesting to see.

If anyone has done a ballistic test on this ammunition, I'd like to see the results.
 
To answer your question OP, yes I would be interested in a review of the performance of this ammunition.

In other words, I would enjoy seeing a ballistic test of this load.

To put it another way, a ballistic test would be interesting to see.

If anyone has done a ballistic test on this ammunition, I'd like to see the results.

Thank you too.

There is a lot of ballistic info available on 7.62x39 ammo that is available in the US but not much info on what we can get here.

Ballistically even fmj all perform differently. That's why I purchase and will slowly stockpile Czech and Chinese 7.62x39 fmj when possible, it yaws much sooner than most fmj.

To some this doesn't matter, some care a little, I care a lot. Anyone that is even remotely considering preparedness or survivalism should care how their ammo performs and should stock up on the best they can afford.

I care, if others care great, if you don't care that's fine. However if all you care to do is detract from this topic please go somewhere else.

Thanks
 
To answer your question OP, yes I would be interested in a review of the performance of this ammunition.

In other words, I would enjoy seeing a ballistic test of this load.

To put it another way, a ballistic test would be interesting to see.

If anyone has done a ballistic test on this ammunition, I'd like to see the results.


Anybody ever the idea of doing a ballistic test of this ammo because I would like to know before buying it......!!!!1
LMFAO.
 
it blows water filled jugs up better then FMJ ammo. So yes it seems to work just fine. It does break some of it off as you can find small parts inside the jug,
 
Back
Top Bottom