just doing some research thought id post to get some cgn'ers opinions
what advantages does 5.56 have over .300 bo?
Americans seem to love it for use with a suppressor, not an option for us Canadians.
I see it compared a lot to 7.62x39 ballistics often in that it has more barrier penetration.
Is there/could a wild chamber like a .243 or .270 that uses a 5.56 case that would fit 5.56 ar magazines, that would out perform the 5.56 and .300bo from 300-500m(in a 18-20" barrel)? i'm guessing it was tried
why did they not use the 6.5 grendel to use 5.56 brass?powder load?
what advantages does 5.56 have over .300 bo?
Americans seem to love it for use with a suppressor, not an option for us Canadians.
I see it compared a lot to 7.62x39 ballistics often in that it has more barrier penetration.
The issue with M193/M855A1/SS109 isn't really prevalent at room clearing distances unless you're using a <10.5" bbl. I don't have hard data on terminal ballistics with the M855A1 projectile, but a significant amount of study was done on the M193. The finding was that below 2700FPS M193 projectiles would no longer fragment or tumble reliably, resulting in much smaller wound channels. Out of a 20" barrel M193 will stay above 2700FPS to a range of approximately 200m. With a 10.5" bbl the velocity at the muzzle sits right at the 2700FPS range. M855A1/SS109 was designed to enhance penetration of barriers, because of this it is less likely to deform on impact increasing the chance that it will fail to cause significant wounding.
I have no doubt that many reports of failure to stop the threat can be put down to poor marksmanship, but there is empirical data to support the idea that the wounding capability of the round is lacking.
When it comes down to it though the 5.56 is the best round for an AR in Canada, we can't use them for anything other than punching paper or doing 3-gun and other competitive shooting events and 223 is the most reliable and flattest shooting of the 3 options. If we could hunt with them or use them for anything away from the range then some of the other options make a lot more sense.
Is there/could a wild chamber like a .243 or .270 that uses a 5.56 case that would fit 5.56 ar magazines, that would out perform the 5.56 and .300bo from 300-500m(in a 18-20" barrel)? i'm guessing it was tried
why did they not use the 6.5 grendel to use 5.56 brass?powder load?


















































