I like the mechanical simplicity of a bolt action.
I will never again use a bolt action for deer in Northern Ontario. The second shot often comes in handy, and I don't care who you are, a bolt action is not the quickest option. Pump, lever or semi
I will never again use a bolt action for deer in Northern Ontario. The second shot often comes in handy, and I don't care who you are, a bolt action is not the quickest option. Pump, lever or semi
In the case of a high powered big game rifle, you can cycle the bolt about as fast as you can recover from the recoil, and get back on target. I have placed two, and even three rounds into an elk or moose in rapid succession , and I have made a few doubles on coyotes with a bolt action.
Yup, never discount what a dedicated shooter can do with a good bolt gun.
I don't really get this argument. In many ways, a bolt gun can be as complex or more complex than a semi-auto.
An interesting opinion could be developed when harvesting multiple animals at a time.
In full hunting centerfire rounds, ie. not blowback pistol cal carbines, no not really. A bolt action shares the lock up and mechanics of striking a primer with a semi auto, but will not require a gas system or other method of unlocking and cycling the action automatically. That is a huge difference and a substantial piece of engineering, and also why bolt actions long predated semi auto centerfires in general usage; they are simpler. They do not make one a better or worse hunter though, a sentiment I agree with.
My hunting partner and I were having a "fireside chat" about various hunting topics as we wait for the snow to melt to bring on spring turkey season ..
The topic of the importance of a rapid second shot in big game hunting situations came up. We typically hunt in the dense "big woods" of Ontario where game encounters can be brief and fast.
He's a Browning BLR fan and said he felt the ability to rapidly chamber a second (or even third) shot while hunting deer in the dense "big woods" is key.
I also have a BLR, but have traditionally been a bolt action guy and am likely returning to that - a long story related to some issues with the BLR thus far. I've long felt that the rapid second shot argument was overrated because 1) the first shot is by far the most important and 2) a bolt action can be worked fast enough to provide a reasonably quick second shot (albeit not nearly as quickly as a semi automatic or lever action) I've only required a second shot (other than to finish off a downed animal) on one occasion and often feel the ability to shoot quickly leads hunters to "spray and pray".
Anyone care to comment?
The ability of being able to make a quick follow up shot can be the difference between a dead or a wounded animal getting away to die later. Which is more ethical?
Most hunters use some form of modern repeating firearm, lever, bolt, pump or semi i personally have never seen anyone hunt with a single shot for big game.
Whatever type of action you use other then a single shot all allow for follow up shots some faster then others.
A mechanical or gas operated semi auto by nature of of the action has less perceived recoil then all other types of actions this allows for faster sight picture re acquisition and faster follow up shot(s).
Now is there a trade off in accuracy? Sure somewhat but that's subjective to the rifle in question, A new production BAR will more then likely out shoot a shot out .303 sporter any day and a super-duper spiral fluted carbotanium heavy barreled bolt gun will out shoot it all things being equal.
Like i said i personally haven't seen anyone hunt with a single shot not to say that people don't the majority of hunters hunt big game with a repeating firearm for example Cabelas only sells six different single shot rifles but sells 107 different bolt gunsLots of people hunt with single shot rifles. They are quite popular but also, expensive and cranky shooters.
Black Powder Muzzle Loader hunters all use single shot rifles, other than the very odd side by side or over under. For the most part, they are well practiced on follow up shots and as often as not, their shots are fairly close. That being said, some of the shots made with the modern inline muzzle loaders are quite impressive.
Back in the day when my eyesight was better, I took a Martini Enfield, chambered in 303 British to some local DCRA shoots. I went into most of the matches and through the drills and didn't feel the least bit undergunned. No, I didn't win the shoots but I didn't place last either. I was shooting against No4 MkI rifles for the most part and the odd Ross. The shoots were set up for the 303 cartridge shooters specifically. Even in the timed shooting events, I never had any issues getting off all ten rounds and getting them on target. Same goes for the pop up targets, held on the end of a pole, in the butts.
There is an old technique that was taught back when those rifles were the backbone of the infantry. You held four cartridges between the fingers and thumb of the off hand. When you eject the fired round, you reach a few inches forward and grab one of the rounds and load so you can continue firing. Your off hand doesn't change position and your sight picture is stable. The shooter of a SS in such an event, also keeps extra cartridges in a pouch or in a loop bandolier in three round groups. This way, when you need ammo, you aren't trying to fumble around with one cartridge at a time and wasting time so you can't get enough rounds on target. This type of training was normal when cartridge loading single shot rifles were the main battle rifles. It was also carried even further by the Brits and colonies right up to 1915. Their 303 Lee Metfords and later SMLEs were equipped with a magazine cut off plate to conserve ammo and basically turn the rifles into single shot weapons until they received orders to open the gate.
Shot placement is key indeed, sometimes you can feel the shot and know if you hit right or not and if you need to shoot again. and sometimes you can'tThe very odd time a follow up shot is needed, it mostly depends on the experience of the hunter.
I've run across guys that just keep on pumping bullets into a walking dead animal on more than one occasion. This usually results in a lot of meat loss and one hell of a mess during field dressing. It isn't at all unusual for an animal to walk/run 25-100 meters with its heart shot out or both lungs shot through. There are only two bullet placements that will drop an animal in its tracks, reliably, to stay down. One, is the brain shot and the other is a spine shot, that either takes out the spinal cord or cuts the two main arteries just under the spine.
I've seen it twice where an animal was hit in the head or antler and got up an ran away no blood only fur where it fell head shots are riskyThe latter is my shot of choice and the lung shot is second. I try to avoid head shots as much as possible. Animals move constantly and the brain is a very small target. I might consider it if the animal is very close and if it's the most reliable option. It hardly ever is.
Training, familiarity, size and fit of the firearm (L.O.P, cheek weld, eye relief) and preference, add cold hands, gloves and a heavy coat into the mix I wonder why anyone would chose a firearm with any more then two controls on it (charging handle and a safety)There is an old saying, Hear one shot = meat in the pot. Hear two shots = maybe meat in the pot. Hear three shots = desperation and open a can of beans for dinner.
Some people really have difficulty operating a bolt action rifle efficiently. Maybe a mental block, lack of coordination??? Those same people have problems operating a pump action or even lever action. That's just the way it is. I prefer a semi auto shotgun over a pump. I have no problems with a bolt action or SxS shotgun either. With a pump though, I fumble.
Once in a while, a second shot is necessary. When it is, the proper firearm, that you are familiar with is a must. There is usually very little time for that second shot and getting on target can be a nightmare. It does happen though and more often than not, it means a lot of tracking to dispatch a wounded animal.
In my mind that would be a Semi auto.If everything comes together, a second shot shouldn't be needed. When fate steps in and it is, you need to be up to the task, with the firearm at hand.
Agreed, or it could be they hunt the same Terran every year and make the same shots from known distances. or they could just leave the wounded ones to the coyotesI see the odd person carrying a Ruger #1 or a Browning 78. The ones I've queried about how well they handle a follow up shot will usually try to cover up and say it's never been needed. Old Betsy is a killer, first time every time.
Balderdash says I. That just means the person doesn't get much game or on the other hand it means they are careful, conscientious hunters who only shoot when they know their is very little to no chance of a poorly placed shot. That is usually acquired by experience. It happens to everyone, what is important is how you handle the situation after.
Knowing your firearm well enough to cover such a situation is a good place to start.
This is your sympathetic nervous system response symptoms are:Sometimes I still get an adrenaline shake. When this happens, I have matured to the point where I just hold off shooting until it subsides.
Often this means the loss of an animal but at least it isn't wounded and walking/running away. Moose and Deer will find a place to lie down when they are badly hit. An Elk will get out of country as fast as it can run. Bears will hole up and are darn hard to find in close cover, unless there is a good blood trail.
Sometimes discretion is the best option. Especially at longer ranges. Hitting a moving animal at 50 meters is usually not to hard, depending on terrain. Hitting a moving animal, 400 meters away, on the far side of a clear cut or alfalfa field is a whole different matter.




























