Who decided that 30 rounds is optimum?

Nelson84

BANNED
BANNED
BANNED
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Location
Kootenays
I have noticed that most new rifles have 30 rounds to a magazine. Who came up with that magic number. Why not 35 why not 40?

Just a concerned gun owner wondering why?
 
Newton.

At some point with most magazine designs, long mags get difficult to fire and change magazines from the prone position.

I'd imagine reliability of spring tension on the follower could be an issue at some point as well.

Need 31?

Change your magazine......
 
Newton.

At some point with most magazine designs, long mags get difficult to fire and change magazines from the prone position.

I'd imagine reliability of spring tension on the follower could be an issue at some point as well.

Need 31?

Change your magazine......

both points perfectly valid and historically correct..
 
Weight of the rounds, magazine spring tension, standard ammo packaging ie 3/20 fills 2mags. The sten. Sterling austen used side mounting in part for reliability not having to overcome gravity to feed. Basically why are martinis like a woman's. Breasts , cause one isn't enough, and three is too many
 
There was a lot more variation during WW2: Stens and MP38/MP40s had 32 round magazines, didn't they? BARs and FG42s had 20, Brens had 30, PPSh stick magazines had 35, M1 carbines had 15 round mags, but 30-round mags were introduced with the select-fire M2s. The MP44 had 30, the Thompson had 20 or 30 round magazines.

Not even the 30 round 5.56mm magazines are completely universal. The HK G33/G53 come with 25, 30, or 40 round magazines. The FAMAS F1 used by the French Army has 25 round magazines, and the Steyr AUG has 42 round magazines available. However, the later FAMAS G2 (French Navy/Marines) and HK G41 take STANAG magazines, so typically take the usual 20 or 30 rounders that ARs do.
 
Weight of the rounds, magazine spring tension, standard ammo packaging ie 3/20 fills 2mags. The sten. Sterling austen used side mounting in part for reliability not having to overcome gravity to feed.

This is a nice theory but it isn't true. I have a 9mm AR conversion that uses Sten mags in the vertical position and they feed just fine.
 
Nobody has ever said 30 rounds is optimum for anything. However, it has to do with shooting prone and not having the mag sitting on the ground. (Magazines are not bipods and shouldn't be used as such. Despite what is mentioned on some forums by inexperience shooters.) Weight is an issue as well, but clearing the ground is more important. Unless you're PBI.
The M1 Carbine has/had/used 15(the standard issue) and 30(issued when the M2 came along. Even though the Carbine started out with select fire.) round mags. No 20's.
A BAR isn't a rifle. It's a light MG. A very early SAW.
 
All US rifles were designed with 20 rds mags in mind. Like BAR, M14, AR15 even M1 Carbine. Then untill in Vietnam soldiers came across AK47 that was equipped with 30 rds mags, since then all assault rifles would be designed as a norm with 30 rds.

Exactly, saw that in a documentary.

30 rounds comes from the AK.
 
Weight of the rounds, magazine spring tension, standard ammo packaging ie 3/20 fills 2mags. The sten. Sterling austen used side mounting in part for reliability not having to overcome gravity to feed. Basically why are martinis like a woman's. Breasts , cause one isn't enough, and three is too many

The Sten wasn't renowned amongst the troops, is was just cheap to make. I've read a number of accounts stating that most of them only loaded 25 rounds in a 32 round magazine to avoid feeding issues. Any more and the increased spring tension turned it into a hit and miss affair.

And two martinis is definitely not enough. Ever watch Total Recall?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom