Picked up my Browning X-Bolt Synthetic Stainless in 243 today. Hoping to personally verify its performance on deer this fall.
Thanks to all for the "real world" feedback.
If the .270 bullet "hardly expanded", it should have continued on and exited the deer. I'm guessing that the round may not have been properly loaded, and was, therefore, lacking speed.
If the .270 bullet "hardly expanded", it should have continued on and exited the deer. I'm guessing that the round may not have been properly loaded, and was, therefore, lacking speed.
Between myself and my brother, we've taken 10 deer over the last 5 years. 95gr Hornady SST. Ranges from 75-250 and only had 1 deer run, and at that he took 2 steps and flopped. Every other buck was the "Bang-flop" that I like. Its a very underrated round. And I dont shoot small bodied deer, southern grain fed deer are big animals. The AVERAGE (some above that weight) weight for them, before they were cleaned was 190 pounds. After you cleaned, skinned etc they were about 110 in most cases.
It boils down to 3 things
- Know your gun and where it's shooting
- Bullet choice
- Range
If you can have all 3 of those things in your favour, you wont ever have a problem.
The .243 works very well " if " there is nothing but clear air between the end of the barrel and the hide of the deer being aimed at. Put some maple gads in the path of a 95 gr. Nosler partition and it may never arrive at the deer. Had that scenario happen a few years back. The 243 kills deer quite well in the open, but stay out of the brush with it as those light fast bullets have no tolerance for it. I have shot several deer with the .243 and 95 gr NP. The internal damage is impressive and the deer never go far.
There should be nothing but clear air between your muzzle and any hide of any animal.
This is self explanatory.
This is why I don't get the "bush" gun thing, gun itself for handling, of course, chambering for bucking debris and obstacles, I don't get it.
No reason a .243 won't work at all.




























