10/22 barrels - something I found interesting

Slaymoar

Regular
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Location
Ontario
I dug this up while looking for the effect of barrel length vs quality etc...

had a play at the range today with my 10/22. i am on good terms with the dealer/gunsmith that operates the range and he let me switch out a few barrels with some 10/22s he had in stock (used) and have a play with his chronograph. the same box of cci subs were used exclisivly and an average fps was taken from 5 rounds. all groups are also 5 rounds of cci subs at 55yds. where i have put +mod a .22 sakmod was fitted.
22 inch standard stainless barrel +mod - 957fps .25 inch group.
20 inch standard barrel +mod - 964fps .5 inch group.
18.5 inch standard carbine barrel +mod - 973fps .5 inch group.
16.12 inch standard compact barrel +mod - 986fps .5 inch group.
14 inch Volquartsen fancy carbon fibre barrel - 1008fps .2 inch group.
12.25 inch cut down standard stainless barrel (my barrel) +mod 1002fps .25 inch group.

hope this info helps. i know it would be more usefull if it was the same barrel cut down a bit at a time. i am also confident that if i had used ammo with a higher powder charge the results would have been different.
link: http://www.sniperforums.com/forum/rimfire/38241-22-lr-barrel-length-performance.html

Does this hold merrit? I am interested in getting a short 12.5 dlask barrel, but only if I retain accuracy over the stock ruger barrel..

What do youguys think?
 
does not sound like any of those barrels where bull (heavy) barrels.

wonder if that makes up for the loss of length?

tell ya what, i have 4 10/22's currently.
2 are shooting factory barrels (one banded and one not)
1 is shooting a Dlask 8.5 Bull
1 is shooting a Dlask 18.5 + compensator (total over 20")

ill try to get out to the range tomorrow and see what i can see for ya.
 
does not sound like any of those barrels where bull (heavy) barrels.

wonder if that makes up for the loss of length?

tell ya what, i have 4 10/22's currently.
2 are shooting factory barrels (one banded and one not)
1 is shooting a Dlask 8.5 Bull
1 is shooting a Dlask 18.5 + compensator (total over 20")

ill try to get out to the range tomorrow and see what i can see for ya.

That would be fantastic!

Thanks :D
 
While I would absolutely not trust the above quoted report, the premise does hold validity with regard to "velocity." There have been dozens of more scientific, "apples to apples" comparisons done and the sweet spot for velocity with .22 LR is generally (not always) 14-16"... Accuracy is another matter, at a given distance say 25/50/100 meters barrel length may have the least impact on accuracy, compared to other factors, such as bore and steel quality, fitment, crown, chamber specs and leade Etc... BUT we have noted deteriorating accuracy with our shorter barrel guns as the distances increase... That has been our experience with the dozens of rimfires that we have built and tested. The guy quoted in the OP's first post, is quoted as openly testing a "PROHIBITED" weapon (unless he is not in Canada?)... Look at the specs for the final gun tested... I would not make any decision based on that info... Shooting .2's and 1/4's at 55 meters with "slapped-on" stock barrels and other mutt barrels in a standard stock? Not likely... Sounds like a kid who wanted to do some online bragging and made up some numbers.
 
Last edited:
@hoytcanon:
The quoted part in the OP is not from Slaymoar, but from another guy in the UK in another forum. So, no prohibited firearms and no children harmed :p
 
@hoytcanon:
The quoted part in the OP is not from Slaymoar, but from another guy in the UK in another forum. So, no prohibited firearms and no children harmed :p

I know that quote was not from Slaymoar... That is pretty clear... I was referring to the individual that he was quoting... I think those results are "suspect."
 
Interesting test. Sounds like hoytcanon needs more coffee. :D

I had already finished my second cup when I posted... These online tests "crack me up"... They are never duplicated at the range in front of witnesses... As I said sounds like a kid who read about the basic premise and made up some numbers... 1/2 MOA with an OEM barrel cut to 12.25" and slapped on... NO TUNING... I have built and tuned and tested dozens of guns... I have seen those results but ONLY with a lot of tinkering and tuning... These kind of reports just frustrate shooters who can't duplicate the results in the "real world."
 
Well i see a biased test!
He starts of with the ammo his own barrel likes best and then feeds it to the mob.
Did he clean the barrels first and then season then before shooting for group?
 
Back
Top Bottom