putting un-necessary stress on the receiver.
The original SR-22 barrel is soo accurate dont understand why anybody would want to change it... JP.
The original SR-22 barrel is soo accurate dont understand why anybody would want to change it... JP.
Off the free floated topic, I did put 12.5 from Dlask on mine. The problem I had it would not extract, I did get new volquaster extractor. It worked fine but on the third magazine about 60 rounds fired in total it ripped back of the empty case and chamber new round.
Results was lots of smoke and small explosion. Looked seriously scarry, luckly nothing happened except extractor flew away not to be seen again.
I think the chambers on Dlask barrels are bit tight
I have the same problem , I cant manually eject a case about half the time ,bit of a pain in the assOff the free floated topic, I did put 12.5 from Dlask on mine. The problem I had it would not extract, I did get new volquaster extractor.
I think the chambers on Dlask barrels are bit tight
It worked fine but on the third magazine about 60 rounds fired in total it ripped back of the empty case and chamber new round.
Results was lots of smoke and small explosion. Looked seriously scarry, luckly nothing happened except extractor flew away not to be seen again.
Sorry OP.I've had the same issue with CCI blazer ammo as well with my 16" Dlask barrel. 1 round went off a little early and blew my extractor out. Scary s***. Called Dlask and was told blazers are about .001 to .002 bigger than most .22 ammo and too tight for the Dlask chamber. They will make the chambers larger if you wish from what I was told.
B.H.
Extractor ripped back of fired case and cycled trying to push new round in to the chamber. Chamber was already blocked with ripped case.
The new round was squeezed by the moving bolt and exploded blowing away extractor. There was no more damage to the gun except blown away extractor



























