You have to drill in order to remove the floorplate of the Tapco mag to remove the stopper. Its permanent as per the law.
slap the mag, feed lips down, while u hold baseplate to the side, and itll open, no tools needed
You have to drill in order to remove the floorplate of the Tapco mag to remove the stopper. Its permanent as per the law.
No it doesn’t. That is not a limiter. It’s a riser with a shortened spring. If you remove the riser the magazine will not function unlike repurposed magazines which will function as 30 round magazines if you remove the pin. It is manufactured this way, not repurposed which your quoted laws apply to.
The real issue would be if they were really designed for a LAR-15
No it doesn’t. That is not a limiter. It’s a riser with a shortened spring. If you remove the riser the magazine will not function unlike repurposed magazines which will function as 30 round magazines if you remove the pin. It is manufactured this way, not repurposed which your quoted laws apply to.
The real issue would be if they were really designed for a LAR-15
It still doesn't change the fact it is still a rifle magazine and not an originally manufactured pistol magazine.
Not to mention, if you remove the riser, and the spring, and replace it with a standard length spring you now have a 30 round magazine.
There is nothing permanent about the limiter/shortened spring combination.
That's not fact, that's your opinion. They are factory stamped as being pistol carbine magazines. The government allowed them to be imported as such. So what evidence do you possess that refutes these actual facts?
Yes, and you would be guilty of manufacturing a prohibited device. Which has nothing to do with how the product is designed or being sold. You can take any 5/30 magazine that the government allows to be sold in Canada and alter it to make it a full capacity magazine. The only condition is that it cannot be done easily. Your fantasy of redesigning the internals of the magazine would seem to be no different than removing a pin on a 5/30 since, once again, the government has allowed both to be imported into the country.
There is nothing in the law that states anything has to be permanent other than the use of a "permanent adhesive substance" in section five in relation to magazines classified under section four. Which doesn't apply given these magazines are not an alteration nor a re-manufacturing. They are designated as being manufactured for pistol carbines to hold 10 rounds of .223 & 5.56x45mm NATO ammunition. That places them in section 1(b).
If the government wants to change the law they can do so but it's funny you guys keep arguing about the legality of something the government is allowing to be imported.
The hex mag comes from the factory with "pistol carbine magazine" clearly written on it from the moulding process. As it is formed into the plastic using a dedicated mould during the manufacturing process, it is a pistol mag as far as I am concerned.
No it doesn’t. That is not a limiter. It’s a riser with a shortened spring. If you remove the riser the magazine will not function unlike repurposed magazines which will function as 30 round magazines if you remove the pin. It is manufactured this way, not repurposed which your quoted laws apply to.
The real issue would be if they were really designed for a LAR-15
For which pistol though?
Lar15 magazines are the only ones we can use in an AR15 rifle. The RCMP were very clear with the wording that needed to be on the magazine when they approved the Lar15 in 2008.
Then how were AT15 mags approved as well and distributed by ATRS??
Because they made the AT15 Pistol and specifically designed AT15 magazines, clearly marked as such, for the pistol. They also designed the floorplate to not be removable without tools... ive never held one but Id imagine they followed the law in that regard, clearly.
Why are people #####ing about having another 10 round pistol mag option, and at the same time ##### about how bad our gun laws are? It's almost as if some of you WANT to be restricted however the RCMP wishes. Sheep much?
That's not fact, that's your opinion. They are factory stamped as being pistol carbine magazines. The government allowed them to be imported as such. So what evidence do you possess that refutes these actual facts?
Yes, and you would be guilty of manufacturing a prohibited device. Which has nothing to do with how the product is designed or being sold. You can take any 5/30 magazine that the government allows to be sold in Canada and alter it to make it a full capacity magazine. The only condition is that it cannot be done easily. Your fantasy of redesigning the internals of the magazine would seem to be no different than removing a pin on a 5/30 since, once again, the government has allowed both to be imported into the country.
There is nothing in the law that states anything has to be permanent other than the use of a "permanent adhesive substance" in section five in relation to magazines classified under section four. Which doesn't apply given these magazines are not an alteration nor a re-manufacturing. They are designated as being manufactured for pistol carbines to hold 10 rounds of .223 & 5.56x45mm NATO ammunition. That places them in section 1(b).
If the government wants to change the law they can do so but it's funny you guys keep arguing about the legality of something the government is allowing to be imported.
Why are people #####ing about having another 10 round pistol mag option, and at the same time ##### about how bad our gun laws are? It's almost as if some of you WANT to be restricted however the RCMP wishes. Sheep much?
rcmp has legally backed themselve into a corner, not us. cleared for import, and several rcmp opinions, published. so no worries