130gr in the .30-06

WhelanLad

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
Australia AU
Gday there fellas,
i just got a bit of a score , i rekon anyway, 200 X 130gr PPSNs for $95

So i might of found a "Summer pill" an not need use those FN 170gr ..

Anyone used 130gr PPSN in the big 30-06?

I'll be shootin them out of the A bolt LH , pretty keen to see how they go actually!


Reading online roumers, the 130gr might be a harder make up than the 150gr? (the whole same jacket -less of it makeup ) ?

interested to see how they go for 'drop' at 300m an even further?? should they be alright for 500m? what do you say?

Thanks!
 
I have some PPSN for the 303 British - 174 grain, .312" diameter - the only ones that I have handled - a bonded (Weldcore) bullet with a flat (not pointed) front end. Ballistic Coefficient is listed as .362 on the box. For comparison, that B.C. is slightly less that a 150 grain .308" Partition, and about the same for a 125 grain .308" Accubond. So, muzzle velocity is part of it, but a big part of "drop" is going to be how fast the bullet slows down in its flight through the air - often, that is what the B.C. number is trying to tell you. The standard Nosler Partition 130 grain in .270, lists .416 as its B.C., so that number will give you a basis to compare with what you have?
 
I just looked up on the Woodleigh site - B.C. for those 130 grain .308" PPSN is .302. So, they are not going to fly like a 130 grain 270 Partition - they are going to slow down more quickly and drop more. A quick look at the tables in the Nosler manual - muzzle velocity of 3,000 fps - "zero" (sighted dead on) at 200 yards - very close to 8" low at 300 and about 23" low at 400. That bullet is rated by Woodleigh for 2,000 fps to 3,000 fps impact velocity - it drops below 2,000 fps somewhere after 300 yards and is at about 1,860 fps at 400 yards, so you should not be depending on Woodleigh PPSN expansion performance much past about 350 yards or so.
 
Last edited:
PPSN = "Protected Point Soft Nose", as far as I can follow the Woodleigh naming... The bullets that I have here for 303 British are "Woodleigh Weldcore" PP SN, so that should be a bonded bullet, with the Protected Point shape and are a Soft Nose, not Full Metal Jacket. I have some more .312" bullets on the way in the mail - they are apparently Woodleigh Weldcore RN (bonded, but with Round Nose shape).

3B261B74-A3FA-4CCD-82BB-9527427059AE.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 3B261B74-A3FA-4CCD-82BB-9527427059AE.jpg
    3B261B74-A3FA-4CCD-82BB-9527427059AE.jpg
    66.6 KB · Views: 333
Last edited:
Several decades ago, when I was still an automotive apprentice, and was feeling the cruel pinch of "want",
I could not afford to purchase a dedicated varmint rifle, so I had to use what I had at the time, a M700
carbine [20" barrel] chambered in the venerable 30-06.
I developed a load which I can still remember well. 130 Speer HP, in a WW case, 55 grains of H4895, sparked
by a CCI 200 primer. It was very accurate, and flirted with 3200 fps. It turned Columbian ground squirrels
into a pink mist. We shot them where they were abundant, generally up higher in the hills, and sometimes
there was still snow in the low areas. The ground squirrels would sometimes venture out onto the snow.
If you shot one there, the results were dramatic!! A large red stain on the snow where the squirrel was, lol.

I am thinking that more than 3000 fps should be available for that 130 grain PPSP, Rhys. I have reached 3000
fps in many 30-06 rifles with the 150 grain bullet. 32-3300 would extend your range somewhat. Dave.
 
As was mentioned, you would gain a bit if you can get to 3,200 fps at muzzle with that 130 grain .308" PPSN. Again, from the tables in the Nosler manual, for that same B.C. of .302, and "zero'd" at 200 yards, that changes the point of impact to minus 6" at 300 yards and minus 20" at 400 yards, and would still be doing just over 2,000 fps at 400 yards. So an increase of 200 fps in muzzle velocity, would get you 2" less drop at 300 yards, 3" less drop at 400 yards, and would extend the rated "impact" velocity window from about 350 yards out to 400 yards. For some distance in front of the muzzle, you would be exceeding the rated impact velocity - say for the first 50 or 60 yards.

I have no clue how significant those numbers are to you and your rifle and what you intend to use it on. A 1 MOA rifle and shooter will be doing 3 inch groups at 300 yards, so may not even be able to tell that the drop, in theory, is 2" less? I tend to look more at design impact velocities, but even then, I don't think they will "bounce off" at 1,999 fps.
 
Last edited:
Hodgdon lists 130gr loads over 3200fps, at that speed, even with the lower BC they are as close to the 270 as sh*t is to swearing.
 
Several decades ago, when I was still an automotive apprentice, and was feeling the cruel pinch of "want",
I could not afford to purchase a dedicated varmint rifle, so I had to use what I had at the time, a M700
carbine [20" barrel] chambered in the venerable 30-06.
I developed a load which I can still remember well. 130 Speer HP, in a WW case, 55 grains of H4895, sparked
by a CCI 200 primer. It was very accurate, and flirted with 3200 fps. It turned Columbian ground squirrels
into a pink mist. We shot them where they were abundant, generally up higher in the hills, and sometimes
there was still snow in the low areas. The ground squirrels would sometimes venture out onto the snow.
If you shot one there, the results were dramatic!! A large red stain on the snow where the squirrel was, lol.

I am thinking that more than 3000 fps should be available for that 130 grain PPSP, Rhys. I have reached 3000
fps in many 30-06 rifles with the 150 grain bullet. 32-3300 would extend your range somewhat. Dave.

When I was a young teacher, I had 2 kids in diapers and could only afford ONE rifle in the safe, I chose a Remmy 700 Police 24” barrel. I had a pile of .308 RCBS tools, and a RCBS Rockchucker 2 on my bench. I found a bunch (like about 500 x count) Remington PSP (pointed soft point) 125 grain boooolits for something like $14 / 100 booolits. I just could not resist. I loaded up the identical load as my M1A NM Course of Fire US Service Rifle load; 43.0 grains of W748 with 168 gr SMK, but this time I sat that 125 grain PSP bulk booolit.

I used that load on many, many ground hogs here in Simcoe County, ON. The results were spectacular and they “Blowed up real good!” I never used them on deer since the deer ‘rifle’ season of 5 days long in November would never see me out of the classroom. So I remained a crappy deer hunter for the rest of my teaching career!

Besides, the varmint season was way longer and that PSS or .308 700 Remmy Police gun sure shot like a laser beam. These days a popular CGNutter owns that rig now and it’s still shoots like a laser beam with it’s original factory barrel.

I never had an access to a Chronograph for in those days, I had very few resources to access. Things are much different now. Life is good.

Peace Be To Journey!

Cheers, Barney
 
I agree with you guys that the data i posted was 'mild'......... thats ADI website for ya! Looking on say Nosler, then Yes there is alot more to potentially gain in the velocity department!

You are Right Potashminer, the BC is lowish on these rounds, an the Cannelure also seats them the same as all the other Woodleighs. I mean my 150gr PPSN (#65f) and #65D 180 gr PPN have the same profile when seated same length.

I read some reviews that the 130gr were doubling in diameter on impact and pulling up in the far side hide of deer, not the big Sambar i hunt but other aussie deer like rusa an red.


Im kind of really keen for this projectile! old mate had another 80 odd which i purchased for the same cost per projectile, looks like AR2206H is possibly a bit uicker than Varget 2208

Those figures ya put out Nels are sounding good to me.... an makes sense RE bc slowin her down.
 
Last edited:
Several decades ago, when I was still an automotive apprentice, and was feeling the cruel pinch of "want",
I could not afford to purchase a dedicated varmint rifle, so I had to use what I had at the time, a M700
carbine [20" barrel] chambered in the venerable 30-06.
I developed a load which I can still remember well. 130 Speer HP, in a WW case, 55 grains of H4895, sparked
by a CCI 200 primer. It was very accurate, and flirted with 3200 fps. It turned Columbian ground squirrels
into a pink mist. We shot them where they were abundant, generally up higher in the hills, and sometimes
there was still snow in the low areas. The ground squirrels would sometimes venture out onto the snow.
If you shot one there, the results were dramatic!! A large red stain on the snow where the squirrel was, lol.

I am thinking that more than 3000 fps should be available for that 130 grain PPSP, Rhys. I have reached 3000
fps in many 30-06 rifles with the 150 grain bullet. 32-3300 would extend your range somewhat. Dave.

With such light bullets, the velocity difference that can be achieved over the 308Win by the 30-06 is not much.

I used to shoot a Rem 700 with a Hart Match Grade barrel, with a 1-15 twist, chambered for the 308Win, shooting Randy Robinette's excellent 115 and 130 grain FBHP bullets with "J cup" custom jackets. Nobbi Uno built that rifle. He had a special reamer, which he extolled and he wasn't stretching the truth. Great smith for building match rifles. He taught me a lot.

These bullets had very consistent thickness all the way around but very thin jackets. I could easily get between 3000fps and 3200fps out of the 24 inch barrel.

The powders I used were BLC-2 with CCI BR LR primers, during warmer weather and W748 with the same primers during colder weather. They both behaved extremely well in my rifle at the time and I had the necessary scope adjustments memorized for both loads, with both weights of bullets.

I sold that rifle but still have the Burris 6X scope, which I should get the fine crosshair and dot reticle replaced. Not sure if it's worth it on a 20+ year old scope.

I found that those same bullets were not happy when shot down barrels with 1-10 twist rates. The jackets had a bad habit of separating from the cores about 50 meters out. With the 1-15 twist rate in my custom barrel, the bullets held together, without issues. The farthest we shot them in Hunter Bench Rest was 300yds and the drop was easily dialed in, without any issues on standard bases, without any elevation built in, on a scope with a 1 inch tube.

My rifle would give about 3100fps with W748 and 130 grain bullets and easily get to 3200fps with BLC-2


I sold that rifle to another competitor, when I went through a bought of Cancer and sold off a lot of stuff to make my wife and myself debt free, in case things didn't work out well.

The fellow that bought it, hated the recoil and had the barrel set back and rechambered for 300BR.

After my life got back to normal, I needed a rifle that would double as a big game rifle and like eagleye, the rifle of choice was a lovely Steyr made 30-06. It was a great rifle.

It was very accurate with 150 to 180 grain bullets, so I thought I should give it a try with the lighter bullets.

Of course I figured a similar load as to that used in the 308Win would be a good place to start. It wasn't bad out to 100yds but just went bad right after. So, I increased the powder charges and things immediately got worse. I couldn't keep it on paper at 50 yds. The bullets would be keyholing or miss the paper completely, (8x11)

That's when a bud that was along told me he thought he could see a vapor trail, through the spotting scope.

He was right. Those bullets weren't made for the spin being induced on them at those velocities and were coming apart.

I had to cut the velocities back to around 2700fps to keep them together and then they shot as well as could be expected.

WhelanLad, I don't have any experience with the bullets you mentioned, so have no idea as to their construction. If they are intended for cartridges, such as the 7.62x39 capacity wise, they may not behave well at higher spin rates, generated by 1-10 twist rate bores.

Likely you have the more modern standard 1-12 twist rate bore in your rifle??? They might just work well.

Good luck.
 
Last edited:
ready for trial, 50gr up to 52gr Varget loaded up!

will let yas know.. ok back.

more powder needed :D recoil is awesome! im liking this so far.. this could be great lol
 
Last edited:
With such light bullets, the velocity difference that can be achieved over the 308Win by the 30-06 is not much.

I used to shoot a Rem 700 with a Hart Match Grade barrel, with a 1-15 twist, chambered for the 308Win, shooting Randy Robinette's excellent 115 and 130 grain FBHP bullets with "J cup" custom jackets. Nobbi Uno built that rifle. He had a special reamer, which he extolled and he wasn't stretching the truth. Great smith for building match rifles. He taught me a lot.

These bullets had very consistent thickness all the way around but very thin jackets. I could easily get between 3000fps and 3200fps out of the 24 inch barrel.

The powders I used were BLC-2 with CCI BR LR primers, during warmer weather and W748 with the same primers during colder weather. They both behaved extremely well in my rifle at the time and I had the necessary scope adjustments memorized for both loads, with both weights of bullets.

I sold that rifle but still have the Burris 6X scope, which I should get the fine crosshair and dot reticle replaced. Not sure if it's worth it on a 20+ year old scope.

I found that those same bullets were not happy when shot down barrels with 1-10 twist rates. The jackets had a bad habit of separating from the cores about 50 meters out. With the 1-15 twist rate in my custom barrel, the bullets held together, without issues. The farthest we shot them in Hunter Bench Rest was 300yds and the drop was easily dialed in, without any issues on standard bases, without any elevation built in, on a scope with a 1 inch tube.

My rifle would give about 3100fps with W748 and 130 grain bullets and easily get to 3200fps with BLC-2


I sold that rifle to another competitor, when I went through a bought of Cancer and sold off a lot of stuff to make my wife and myself debt free, in case things didn't work out well.

The fellow that bought it, hated the recoil and had the barrel set back and rechambered for 300BR.

After my life got back to normal, I needed a rifle that would double as a big game rifle and like eagleye, the rifle of choice was a lovely Steyr made 30-06. It was a great rifle.

It was very accurate with 150 to 180 grain bullets, so I thought I should give it a try with the lighter bullets.

Of course I figured a similar load as to that used in the 308Win would be a good place to start. It wasn't bad out to 100yds but just went bad right after. So, I increased the powder charges and things immediately got worse. I couldn't keep it on paper at 50 yds. The bullets would be keyholing or miss the paper completely, (8x11)

That's when a bud that was along told me he thought he could see a vapor trail, through the spotting scope.

He was right. Those bullets weren't made for the spin being induced on them at those velocities and were coming apart.

I had to cut the velocities back to around 2700fps to keep them together and then they shot as well as could be expected.

WhelanLad, I don't have any experience with the bullets you mentioned, so have no idea as to their construction. If they are intended for cartridges, such as the 7.62x39 capacity wise, they may not behave well at higher spin rates, generated by 1-10 twist rate bores.

Likely you have the more modern standard 1-12 twist rate bore in your rifle??? They might just work well.

Good luck.

That was a long-winded way of saying "I don't know"!
 
You're right but I thought I should throw in the experience I had with such light bullets in my rifle. Hopefully his bullets have thicker jackets or his rifle has a slower twist rate.

projies are stanard weldcore or ppsn woodleighs just less rear shank, so im confident with the bonding process to hang together at velocity, rated 3000 impact,
only starting off in that ball parkwith varget, was fading light but i put 2 together an its throwing one well out, not sure if hot barrel or first cold is throwing.

im goin to ramp up the powder tho until primer shows bit more flatter, which i suspect will be around max of 53.5, whats the thoughts on going over that with varget, app its around 48,500 cup W max at 50,000..... an 2206h gives same Velocity with less pressure.... is 2213SC (slower/ h4835sc) worth a crack or is it too slow?

also looked up the barrel spec, 22 inch with a 1:10.......... seems to be doin ok, will see if bit more velocity opens up a tighter node
 
Back
Top Bottom