Threemorewishes
CGN Regular
- Location
- Ottawa Ontario Canada
Bull's-Eye - Go for the .22, especially if you ever plan to hunt anything with it.
Anyone tried a .25 cal at 495? I could see penetration being a problem even though it could be carrying anywhere up to 4 times the energy with super heavy pellets. But more energy would be nice to have.
It's fun to shoot phone books but that is the kind of thing that may have zero comparison to the field. Resistant materials "always" penetrate better with smaller pellets or arrows from the same power plant, but the performance on game may be another mater.
My experience with airguns include target competitions and hunting. I only have .177 caliber airguns, but have both a 495ft/s and a 750ft/s gun. I'm confident the 750ft/s will take down any squirrel (including black/grey), rabbit, crow, or pigeon up to 20 yards.
With the 495ft/s, shot placement becomes very important. Had a pesky black European squirrel digging up the place. Even a shot behind the front arm would not take him out. Just knocked him back before he ran off. I had him cornered and wounded between some ceiling pipes. He wasn't running off, so I popped him 3 times in the chest area from 3 feet away. He just squealed everytime. It was the most awful sound. I finally got him face to face at about 25 paces. He looked up and I let the shot go just under the chin. That dropped him on the spot. With crows, an upper chest or neck shot will do very nicely. They don't even get into the air. Silences that grotesque cawing and replaces it with a beautiful gurgle.
Now, a .22 rifle with CBs... that's the way to go! More silent than the 750ft/s, same velocity, and way more mass (28gr bullet vs 7.7gr pellet).
I tested the Predator pellets against flat match pellets and was not impressed. I fired 4 pellets of each type into each quadrant on 2 phone books at 5 feet using the 750ft/s gun. Not only did the Predators not penetrate deeper, they didn't expand at all. The lead around the plastic just pressed rearwards.