...

A NR high-end PCC sounds like a great idea..and then I ask myself what would I do with it? And in what NR situation would I select a pistol calibre over a riflle calibre in a gun I already own. A full length NR barrel kinda spoils the PCC factor, and I suppose I just associate a PCC with range use, steel and competition, which puts me into a restricted gun anyway.
For those reasons I can't imagine a demand. Not that there needs to be a reason for anything..but can't see alot of buyers.
Just my thoughts.
 
jiffx2781 said:
And I can't imagine why anyone would want a firearm that would subject them regulations that would regulate them to use said firearm only on a heavily regulated range.

This is the reason I don't own an AR-15 in this country and the reason I'm ok with paying a decent price for a top quality product that does NOT subject me to restricted regulations.

All those things you can do with your restricted on the range I can do off the range as well. But can you shoot rabbits, gophers or coyotes with your restricted, while it's regulated to the range? A pcc is perfectly capable.

What one individual has or sees no use for another individual does.
Click to expand...

I've never seen gophers launched off the ground or out of their holes as nicely as a 124gr hollow point 9mm will do it out of a PCC. They are some much fun. If they would offer a PCC in something along the lines of 10mm auto or similar kinetic energy rounds I wouldn't hesitate using it on deer.
 
I plan on being behind a pcc quite a bit next year both plinking and in competition. The idea of a modern plinker sounds awesome to me. If they could come in around the price of the jp pcc build that would be awesome, but like a lot here I would probably go the build my own route.
 
Man they don't have that many employees, theyre already backlogged at minimum a year with sporters alone i dont think now is the time to start another project especially one that would be extremely niche like a pcc which is inherently limited to the degree that having a precision company manufacture it would be redundancy on multiple levels...
 
eldarbo said:
Man they don't have that many employees, theyre already backlogged at minimum a year with sporters alone i dont think now is the time to start another project especially one that would be extremely niche like a pcc which is inherently limited to the degree that having a precision company manufacture it would be redundancy on multiple levels...
Click to expand...

No kidding! They still need to build the bolt action bullpup we’ve been whining for first! It’s a good idea, but I think the FX-9 price range is the most the majority will pay. As a matter of fact why not just get an FX-9?
 
I would invest my money into a Canadian made NR PCC. The more NR options we have available the better, especially coming for a high end, Canadian manufacturer.

Nothing sells better than a product that someone can assemble themselves with their own personal touches. A MPX is really nice, but very pricey if you're going to convert it to a NR. Having a NR PCC receiver that takes common AR parts to assemble would be enough reason to buy at least one. I know I would.

A SIG MPX is $2400 before converting to NR, If the "Modern plinker" receiver was priced the same as a MS it would come in much cheaper. If it took glock mags to boot! thats a wet dream.
 
I would like to see it like this from top to bottom, make
It happen please!!
Modern Twelve
Modern PPC
Modern Fifty (with a 20mm upper accessory)
Modern Magnum
 
NR is our future. True, ATRS has their plate full and then some, but the notion of somehow getting a quality NR PCC is very appealing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom