1854 SW lever gun

terez

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
912   0   0
Location
Rural ON
Quite interested in the S&W 1854 lever rifle
Been reading up/reviews etc

All good so far.

I like the design/features/sites/stainless etc.
The action appears at a glance very Henry looking. I know SW claims its based on its original volcanic rifle ...fair bit of romantic nostalgia marketing goin on there me thinks...

Its priced very well....so well Im concerned??

Anyone handled one/have one....have any feedback on them?
 
To me, the rifle appears to be a cross between a Henry and a Marlin. An interesting rifle, which should appeal to those who may like a short, light, fast and very modern lever action hunting rifle. Which does possess some well thought out, useful and practical features.
I agree, though ...A bit overly romanticized. Smith & Wesson may have originally developed the Volcanic. But,.. that's where the similarity ends.
Reviews do seem pretty positive on the rifle, though. I suspect that performance will be on par with its Henry and Marlin rivals.
 
Last edited:
More concerned with build quality ....

Not sure where SW is in this respect in general??
I dont trust any of the big bames anymore ....they have either been corrupted by the times and or the company is only in name anymore and actually manufactured by a schill

How are the products that SW are bangin out these days ??
 
terez: Like you, I am skeptical of a lot of products being manufactured today. Including firearms. The fairly recent problems with Marlin rifles after the Remington acquisition, being fresh in many people's memories. So any new gun coming on the market....especially one not usually seen as a manufacturer of long guns, like Smith & Wesson....is going to be looked at pretty closely.

From following various forums like: Smith & Wesson forum. Plus other sources, the general consensus is that current Smith & Wesson build quality is generally very good. Though there will always be some manufacturing flaws that slip through, from time to time. A fact that exists in every mass-produced product. S & W being no exception. My own experience with S&W's over the years has been quite positive. This includes recent (Before the Big Handgun Freeze) production.

I expect that the 1854 will be no exception.

Likely the most honest and unbiased review of the 1854 I've seen, was recently featured on the Hickock45 you tube site. Hickock45, is a well known name in the shooting world. Equally well known ,for his unvarnished reviews of the various firearms that he evaluates. He refuses to be sponsored by any gun company. So his opinions on guns can be taken pretty much at face value....at least in my view.

Hickock...though he admits to being a traditionalist, when it comes to lever rifles... generally liked the 1854.

The video review is worth checking out. It may help answer some of your questions.

My general impression of the 1854 is that it appears to be a very practical and well designed, no-nonsense hunting rifle.

Hopefully, you get the opportunity to handle....and especially shoot one.

Al
 
Last edited:
I don't feel any attraction to the 1854, although I do like most lever action rifles in general. I can't put my finger on a particular reason, it just doesn't appeal to me. Might be that I change my mind after I get to handle one.
 
Im a life long lever lover....ownmnay and have owned even more that have come/gone.

Ive not been a fan of most of the traditional designs that have been modernized...the blend of newer features such as synthetic materials/stainless steel and better sites etc doesnt seem to end up correct to me.

From what I see so far the SW 1854 seems to do it right...stainless is the right material for sure...synthetic stock...quality peep sites that are incorporated in the design....a solid top strap...loading from the tube as well as a loading gate....all features I am looking for in a modern lever.

The threaded muzzle unecessary to me (I will have it machined off regardless) and the barrel looks unecessarily heavy ( likely to avoid a bulbous end for the muzzle threading likely makes the rifle heavier than needed/wanted but can live with it.
Otherwise the execution looks very good to me in concept and design.
The only thing remains to be seen is build quality and reliability.

Are the small parts tool steel or mim?? likewise for screws and fasteners??

The pricepoint is very aggressive/impressive....which of course is appealing but is a red flag to me regarding the above concerns
 
terez: Like you, I am skeptical of a lot of products being manufactured today. Including firearms. The fairly recent problems with Marlin rifles after the Remington acquisition, being fresh in many people's memories. So any new gun coming on the market....especially one not usually seen as a manufacturer of long guns, like Smith & Wesson....is going to be looked at pretty closely.

From following various forums like: Smith & Wesson forum. Plus other sources, the general consensus is that current Smith & Wesson build quality is generally very good. Though there will always be some manufacturing flaws that slip through, from time to time. A fact that exists in every mass-produced product. S & W being no exception. My own experience with S&W's over the years has been quite positive. This includes recent (Before the Big Handgun Freeze) production.

I expect that the 1854 will be no exception.

Likely the most honest and unbiased review of the 1854 I've seen, was recently featured on the Hickock45 you tube site. Hickock45, is a well known name in the shooting world. Equally well known ,for his unvarnished reviews of the various firearms that he evaluates. He refuses to be sponsored by any gun company. So his opinions on guns can be taken pretty much at face value....at least in my view.

Hickock...though he admits to being a traditionalist, when it comes to lever rifles... generally liked the 1854.

The video review is worth checking out. It may help answer some of your questions.

My general impression of the 1854 is that it appears to be a very practical and well designed, no-nonsense hunting rifle.

Hopefully, you get the opportunity to handle....and especially shoot one.

Al

Sorry Hickock 45 doesn't review, he just rambles and talks about the old days and shoots at a 36 inch plate at 75 yards.. yawwnnn..
A review involves long term use and comparisons and evaluations.. these are just opinions and brochures.
 
Back
Top Bottom