Yes there is a difference
I found the max. loads of Hodgdon loading data not only
to be hard on the shoulder but also the brass extraction is
somewhat difficult in my 1895 guide gun.
I didn't find any noticeable difference between IMR4198 and H4198, has anyone ?
I have loaded both IMR4198 and H4198 for at least 10 45-70's.
there is a difference if you want to maximize the performance (velocity wise).
I found that IMR4198 reached peak pressures in which case extraction became sticky sooner, at a lower realized velocity. But it shot accurately.
H4198 reached higher velocity before pressures became an issue.
Accuracy was also good.
I found that overall, the H4198 had a better load density and a more consistant standatd deviation and extream spread.
This again is tested with at least 10 different rifles/varing barrel lengths etc.
But all Marlin levers.
This powder is definitely worth a serious try.
As bullet weight went up, the H4198 seemed to perform better.
I have settled with two bullet weights for my levers.
350grains and 400grains.
I have not experimented with heavier bullet weights than this, due to the limited ability of the lever actions to function through the action. "too long".
And too much case capacity lost if seated deeper to compensate.
Some 45-70 rifles may not like these powders, but I have yet to see it.
Long barreled Single shots may perform better with other powder burn rates.
There is allot of experienced shooters here on gunnutz, hopefully more of them cam chime in and give more information that can help.
The 45-70. Really does start to recoil heavily when working in the upper range of powder charges! So pick your loads according to purpose.
And just have fun with it!
Straight shootin guys!