1903 springfield price check.......pic heavy

bros

Regular
Super GunNutz
Rating - 100%
32   0   0
Looking to get your thoughts on this Springfield I came across as well what would be a fair market price to pay for this piece?

The bore is in excellent shape.....stock is in nice shape with the exception of a couple of impressions, the butt right behind the tang seems to have a hairline crack.

The stock is absent of any markings!

Thanks for your input.

20201113_195252_resized.jpg20201113_195208_resized.jpg20201113_194456_resized.jpg20201113_194425_resized.jpg20201113_193820_resized.jpg20201113_204924_resized.jpg20201113_204827_resized.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20201113_195252_resized.jpg
    20201113_195252_resized.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 322
  • 20201113_195208_resized.jpg
    20201113_195208_resized.jpg
    51.5 KB · Views: 324
  • 20201113_194456_resized.jpg
    20201113_194456_resized.jpg
    41.5 KB · Views: 324
  • 20201113_194425_resized.jpg
    20201113_194425_resized.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 325
  • 20201113_193820_resized.jpg
    20201113_193820_resized.jpg
    45.1 KB · Views: 323
  • 20201113_204924_resized.jpg
    20201113_204924_resized.jpg
    42.5 KB · Views: 324
  • 20201113_204827_resized.jpg
    20201113_204827_resized.jpg
    46.8 KB · Views: 320
More pictures....................20201113_195131_resized.jpg20201113_195009_resized.jpg20201113_194942_resized.jpg20201113_194921_resized.jpg20201113_194806_resized.jpg20201113_194703_resized.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20201113_195131_resized.jpg
    20201113_195131_resized.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 320
  • 20201113_195009_resized.jpg
    20201113_195009_resized.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 321
  • 20201113_194942_resized.jpg
    20201113_194942_resized.jpg
    50.2 KB · Views: 320
  • 20201113_194921_resized.jpg
    20201113_194921_resized.jpg
    34.7 KB · Views: 318
  • 20201113_194806_resized.jpg
    20201113_194806_resized.jpg
    39.1 KB · Views: 317
  • 20201113_194703_resized.jpg
    20201113_194703_resized.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 322
It is a low number Rock Island which was rebuilt. The bolt is nickel steel. Many low number Springfields were refurbished during WW2. Set up with nickel steel bolts and minimum headspace, they were issued. The "scant" stock is WW2, of course.
Whether or not it is a shooter is a personal decision; CMP advises against shooting low number Springfields.
This will affect the value, of course.
 
I've always avoided shooting low number Springfields because of cautions about the heat treatment of the early receivers. Its a typical WW2 rebuild with an interesting marking on top of the barrel. The cracked stock at the rear of the tang is caused by the tang being in hard contact with the wood which acts as a recoil lug. There should be some clearance here which can be achieved by shimming the stock where the recoil lug bears.

I'd buy the rifle as a parts source, rather than a shooter.
 
If that were my rifle and I wanted to shoot it, I would magnaflux the receiver and if there weren't any visible defects, I would shoot it with handloads that are loaded to milspec pressures.

The big problem with these rifles, when they kaboom, is that there isn't a good indicator to show something is going on. They just go kaboom, no stretching etc.

I've had a couple that actually had cracked receiver rings. The cracks occurred when the barrel was tightened into the receiver.

The cracks weren't visible to the naked eye and were detected by magnafluxing, which you can do with a horseshoe magnet or two magnets and some iron filings.

I've had the same issue with Pattern 14 and Pattern 17 receivers.

There was definitely an issue with the low serial number rifles but they were kept in service and reissued right into the Korean War and then they were lend leased to other nations and sold off as surplus. The amount of proven failures, due to heat treatment is quite low. Sadly, it was a hit and miss system of treatment and depended on the vision of the person doing the job.

PO Ackley used to "reheat treat" all of the low number receivers before they went out of his shop. With todays tech, reheat treating is a dying art.

There are still places that do the work but whether it's worth the cost or not????????????

Low number rifles are historical as well and they are getting harder to find.

That rifle should bring in at least $750 and maybe more IMHO
 
Last edited:
Safety of low number receivers is an old chestnut which gets back to the single heat treated carbon steel receivers which were judged more brittle than those of later make. These rifles are now more than 100 years old, and safety cannot be tested or predicted. I avoid the low numbers for this reason, but one in original, unrebuilt condition would be a valuable collectors item. There are enough high number receivers with double heat treated carbon steel, nickel steel, or moly steel receivers available to avoid buying one of the low numbers as a shooter.
 
"Hatcher's Notebook" has an intensive discussion of these rifles. US Ordnance determined that re-heat treating was not a solution. If the receivers had been burned originally, there was nothing that could be done. Keep in mind that the low numbered range comprises about a million rifles. Odds are very much against a rifle failing. But if one does, the failure is bad. I suppose it could be argued that if a rifle over 100 years old hasn't failed, it probably isn't going to. Keep in mind how close one's face is to the action when the rifle is fired. Is it worth it?
 
Back
Top Bottom