1944 Vintovka Mosina (Mosin Nagant) Tula Ex-sniper Refurb Refinish

Dakk

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
A friend picked up this 44 Tula Vintovka Mosina (Mosin Nagant) ex-sniper from WestRifle. The plan was to keep it as is, but use it both at the range and for hunting. There was no plan to reconvert it or anything like that. But when it arrived the dark shellac was terrible. On the muzzle end the shellac was worn badly. On the butt end, the shellac was so thick you could only see the wood grain in pictures where a flash was used. The seller wasn't even able to identify that it had a laminated stock. I only discovered the laminated stock after the shellac was removed. There were also some pretty bad dings, and breaks in the stock and I think the thickness and darkness of the shellac was due to trying to hide the damage when it went through Soviet refurb.

I refinished the stock, using a method that I hoped would preserve the old rifle's character but provide a nicer and more durable finish. Instead of sanding the rifle down, I kept all the marks and wear. I used 'Circa 1850' furniture stripper which isn't a harsh stripper, but it nicely removed the old shellac, leaving the wood's patina. I then used an old clothes iron and wet rags to 'steam' out any remaining gunk from the pores of the wood stock. I skipped the sanding step, and applied a cherry wood stain that was customized with an additional 21 shots of red. I finished with Tru-Oil. Birchwood Casey makes a conditioner that will change the glossy finish into a satin finish, but I decided to keep it glossy for awhile at least. The stock had a Tula star which could barely be seen before the refinish job. Now it shows up much better.

Before:

mosinmuzzle-0.jpg


before_refinish_01-0.jpg





After:

finished02-0.jpg


finished01-0.jpg



Tula Star:

gloss_finish_01-0.jpg
 
1) That's not a laminate.
2) The original finish is what that rifle was supposed to look like.

Glad you like the finished product. Personally, I liked it better "before".

I have to commend you for not sanding though.
 
1) That's not a laminate.
2) The original finish is what that rifle was supposed to look like.

Thanks, but...

2) Its a 'refurbed ex-sniper', and the stock itself isn't even original. If the stock isn't original, the stock's shellac finish clearly wasn't either. It was clearly darkened to hide the damage to the stock.

1) Pretty sure that's not standard hardwood. Hard to see in these pictures, but there definate verticle lines running through the wood that look far too defined and straight to be natural. But let me know what you think after seeing these.

dscn3071-0.jpg


fracture-0.jpg
 
Yea, I don't think it's laminate either. A laminate, would have a hard time cracking like that. I believe what you are seeing is the grain of the wood. Laminate was placed 90 degrees to each layer making it look dark and light. You are correct the lines are vey straight but the color goes dark then light within each grain not layer by layer.
Nice job though and nice ex sniper.To much to ask for it to be matching numbers?!?
 
Its birch.

Thanks for the second opinion desporterizer.

I don't have any experience with laminated stocks, but I've seen a number of striped birch hardwood stocks, and from the butt end I've never seen one with such well defined and straight verticle lines. But I'll definately take the word of people who are more experienced than I.
 
Yea, I don't think it's laminate either. A laminate, would have a hard time cracking like that. I believe what you are seeing is the grain of the wood. Laminate was placed 90 degrees to each layer making it look dark and light. You are correct the lines are vey straight but the color goes dark then light within each grain not layer by layer.
Nice job though and nice ex sniper.To much to ask for it to be matching numbers?!?

Hey, thank you very much for weighing in on this, and for the kind compliment. As I mentioned above, I'll take your guys' word for it that its not a laminate. That actually answers a little mystery for me, related to the stock. It has a 1930's Tula Star stamp, which would be too early for laminates I think.

It does have all matching numbers on the hardware, plus the 'CN' Tula sniper mark, and the filled receiver holes. The stock is a Tula also, but not the original stock. The Tula Star stamp on the stock has a date 1930's date which is very vague. It couldn't be seen at all under the shellac, but when the shellac was coming off you could read '193-something'). There's a 'no smithing' scope mount on it in the picture, but we're planning to keep it iron sights I think.
 
Back
Top Bottom