1953 Izhevsk sks questions

frenchyguy

CGN Regular
Rating - 98.7%
77   1   0
Location
New Brunswick
hello, about 9-10 years ago, i bought a 1953 Izhevsk sks, for 500 dollars, i think, an un-thinkable price for a sks at that time for a non collector, but i fell in love with it. it has all matching numbers, everything seems correct, but i would like to know for sure if it is a refurb or not. can anyone help?


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v9dBCafqTwd4lh6mv4jt8AiQYTPd87vX/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eLKoWnHsmhYd-KVCIS_kYMadmEYGns4A/view?usp=sharing


view
view
 
Last edited:
Take a look at Yooper J's site through a quick google. Very informative site to help ID your SKS.
If I'm not mistaken, which I may be - Most refurbs had a refurb marking on them (square with a slash through it I think). If you could post or link to some pics of your SKS it would help a lot and I'm sure a more informed poster than me can guide you in the proper direction.
 
Hi all; late to the party. All truly non-refurbished 1953 Izhevsk SKS's have one defining and unusual trait... their stocks are more of a honey blonde finish, not the typical Russian red that was also introduced to Izhevsk SKS's starting in 1954. Here's a few photos of one of only three confirmed non-refurbished 1953 Izhevsk's in Canada that I am aware of...
2022-02-14_01-01-18.jpg
2022-02-14_01-01-12.jpg
2022-02-14_01-01-05.jpg
2022-02-14_01-00-53.jpg

Exceedingly well made and extremely rare.
 

Attachments

  • 2022-02-14_01-01-18.jpg
    2022-02-14_01-01-18.jpg
    110.4 KB · Views: 265
  • 2022-02-14_01-01-12.jpg
    2022-02-14_01-01-12.jpg
    55.4 KB · Views: 263
  • 2022-02-14_01-01-05.jpg
    2022-02-14_01-01-05.jpg
    121.4 KB · Views: 263
  • 2022-02-14_01-00-53.jpg
    2022-02-14_01-00-53.jpg
    107.5 KB · Views: 258
I also have one
 

Attachments

  • 80754B30-D2BB-49EF-80BB-4FFB0DB20E30.jpg
    80754B30-D2BB-49EF-80BB-4FFB0DB20E30.jpg
    90.3 KB · Views: 237
  • 57F096D5-35AA-4C63-8007-FA0A75960217.jpg
    57F096D5-35AA-4C63-8007-FA0A75960217.jpg
    87.3 KB · Views: 238
  • 2F4935F0-0260-42D6-89D3-6C25D07FDB03.jpg
    2F4935F0-0260-42D6-89D3-6C25D07FDB03.jpg
    68 KB · Views: 238
  • 8CBBDDC8-3F31-4F5A-B6D8-A359CCA2062F.jpg
    8CBBDDC8-3F31-4F5A-B6D8-A359CCA2062F.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 236
  • 80D3225C-F8EB-44A1-B4F9-7073AAFB2F13.jpg
    80D3225C-F8EB-44A1-B4F9-7073AAFB2F13.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 236
Hi all; late to the party. All truly non-refurbished 1953 Izhevsk SKS's have one defining and unusual trait... their stocks are more of a honey blonde finish, not the typical Russian red that was also introduced to Izhevsk SKS's starting in 1954. Here's a few photos of one of only three confirmed non-refurbished 1953 Izhevsk's in Canada that I am aware of...
View attachment 564473
View attachment 564474
View attachment 564476
View attachment 564477

Exceedingly well made and extremely rare.

What do the 2 letters in the circle mean?
 
Hi all; late to the party. All truly non-refurbished 1953 Izhevsk SKS's have one defining and unusual trait... their stocks are more of a honey blonde finish, not the typical Russian red that was also introduced to Izhevsk SKS's starting in 1954. Here's a few photos of one of only three confirmed non-refurbished 1953 Izhevsk's in Canada that I am aware of...
View attachment 564473
View attachment 564474
View attachment 564476
View attachment 564477

Exceedingly well made and extremely rare.

Wow how much is thos one worth?
 
Hard to say, but if I still owned it, I would NEVER sell. Even $2000 doesn't get you much today, so there's really no incentive to sell such fine gems.
 
Hi all; late to the party. All truly non-refurbished 1953 Izhevsk SKS's have one defining and unusual trait... their stocks are more of a honey blonde finish, not the typical Russian red that was also introduced to Izhevsk SKS's starting in 1954. Here's a few photos of one of only three confirmed non-refurbished 1953 Izhevsk's in Canada that I am aware of...
View attachment 564473
View attachment 564474
View attachment 564476
View attachment 564477

Exceedingly well made and extremely rare.



Wow that's one of the nicest most clean sks rifles I have ever seen . sellers remorse ? it is what it is . again very clean .
 
hello, about 9-10 years ago, i bought a 1953 Izhevsk sks, for 500 dollars, i think, an un-thinkable price for a sks at that time for a non collector, but i fell in love with it. it has all matching numbers, everything seems correct, but i would like to know for sure if it is a refurb or not. can anyone help?


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v9dBCafqTwd4lh6mv4jt8AiQYTPd87vX/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eLKoWnHsmhYd-KVCIS_kYMadmEYGns4A/view?usp=sharing


view
view



when I enhanced those photos I never saw any stamps around the the cross bolt. the bolt going through the stock at the front . it is blued not painted . and only one stamp across the one side of the stock . more than likely you could sell it for double or more than you paid for it but you could never replace it . from what I have read they were only made for half of the year in 1953 and a full year in 1954 .
 
The claim is often made that crossbolt stamps on the left side of the rifle are an indication of an all original, as issued rifle.


Does this mean that stocks with crossbolt stamps on both sides of the rifle more original or less original than rifles with crossbolt stamps only on the left side? Or might right and lefts side crossbolt stamps be an indication of something else?


There is simply no way that a original lacquer finish would resemble the above 53 and 54 Izzy's after 70 years-- 40-50 years of which would have been spent in crate storage in the extreme fluctuations of heat, freezing winter temps and humidity of CCPs. In such conditions a lacquer finish on birch hard wood would start to flake and peel in 4-5 years.
 
hello, about 9-10 years ago, i bought a 1953 Izhevsk sks, for 500 dollars, i think, an un-thinkable price for a sks at that time for a non collector, but i fell in love with it. it has all matching numbers, everything seems correct, but i would like to know for sure if it is a refurb or not. can anyone help?


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1v9dBCafqTwd4lh6mv4jt8AiQYTPd87vX/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eLKoWnHsmhYd-KVCIS_kYMadmEYGns4A/view?usp=sharing


view
view

Frenchguy-

The apparent absence of and Izhevsk arsenal stamp and date on the stock would be an indication of post production work. Only with better, and more detailed photos will it be possible to opine on any work that was done and to what extent.
 
Back
Top Bottom