22-250 or 243?

yeah right I was told 22-250 was a barrel burner 20 years ago when I bought my first one. If you load 40 grain bulllets to exceed 4000 fps they will burn like a 220 swift but many of us shoot 55 grains at 3400 and still have that original 22-250 thousands of rounds later and it is still doing fine.
Like urban legends there are alot of things repeated on the gun forums that have no basis in fact. "heard it from a guy" is not an example of a proven case.

"Doing fine" is perfectly acceptable for a hunting rifle, and your gopher-capable groups will serve you well beyond what a precison shooter would consider burned-out. This is a precision rifle forum and most precision shooters have a considerably higher standard of accuracy. When a barrel stops creating .2-.3 MOA 15 shot groups, it ceases to be useful to me.

Simple bullet weight differences have little to do with barrel wear. That is a byproduct of heat and pressure. Depending on the powder, you can have maximum loads over 60,000 psi, or you may have maximum loads with pressures barely 45,000 PSI... all with the same bullets. How you shoot your firearms determines barrel wear. Heat is a throat killer.

While there are certainly contributors to forums, whose credentials may be questionable, there are many whose credentials are above reproach. Look before you slag.
 
A friend of mine is looking to pick up a Tikka varmint rifle for a gopher trip but he's stuck between 243 or 22-250. He's got a deer rifle already and he loads his own rounds.
Anyone got any advise or pros & cons?

A gopher is a little bigger than a mouse,:D 204 Ruger or 223 in a tikka would be my choice. Both of those mentioned are barrel burners, especiallly with the amount of shooting one can do in a session. You "will" heat the barrel up way quicker with the 243 and 22-250. I know, I have been there and done that. It is also nice to spot your hits, if I were to use them again I would put a brake on them. May I say I don't want to start a brake, no brake, too loud, blah,blah,blah.
 
I would choose a .243 just because you can do more with it. If you think the .243 is too hard on barrels then consider a 6XC (6mm-22-250 with a 20 degree shoulder) which has about 7 grs less capacity. I seem to be shooting a few hundred 55 gr BTs in a year, and my experience is that they give up accuracy quickly after 3-400 yards, and the wind blows them around despite the short time it takes for them to get to the target. My choice for a .22 centerfire at this moment would be a .222 magnum, with a fast twist barrel. This cartridge is reloading friendly, having the long neck of a .222, but the speed of a .223.
 
Back
Top Bottom