I said 7.62x39 surplus and 223. Hp
7.62x39 surplus comes from the russians and others
And yes homeland security is buying it up.
223. Rem hp (not 5.56 nato fmj) is also being bought
By dhs over 2 billion rounds.
Dizzy is right, they are also buying up 7.62x39 surplus and 223. Hollow point
dizzy said that the US govt is buying up rimfire rounds. you agreed. so, you are agreeing that the government is buying rimfire rounds. my comments in this thread can often be applied to all types of ammunition. however, as this is the rimfire forum i am speaking specifically about that. and of course both DHS and the military are buying russian surplus 7.62 rounds. its cheaper to do that than it is to make it. they would be stupid not to buy it. many law enforcement agencies that the DHS supply use the round. in fact, the comments you have made about DHS buying boatloads of ammo was addressed in one of the articles linked. DHS supplies ammo from everything to boarder patrol, TSA, ATF, DEA, etc. in fact in every one of these articles, the sources from the ammo manufacturers have stated that government contracts make up only a small portion of their production. the rest goes to regular retail. so make comments about the government buying rounds all you want. thats true. nobody has debated that. what i, and many others have said in this thread, is that the notion that there is a conspiracy of people going into stores to buy ammo for the government is crazy.
lets just say that the US government supplies ammo to a million people (which is low when you consider all branches of the military as well as civilian LE), and each of those people only use 2k rounds a year through both their duties and training, that is still 2 billion rounds a year. it all adds up. and if you are doing automatic fire training a 30 round mag will last maybe 5 seconds if you dump it.
then you have the mass purchases of both .223 and 7.62 guns from 2007-2013 (with easing off periods in there) when people were going nuts buying up anything and everything in preparation for a ban (rightly so. it was close). well, now all those people need ammo for their guns. at the same time people who already had those firearms were adding to their stockpile. moreover, there was another huge demographic added. female shooters boomed in the past several years with excellent marketing campaigns from advocacy groups as well as the shooting community gearing up for female programs. the center-fire ammo situation is just as much of a result of supply and demand as the rimfire one is.
This is not up for debate, its fact. I could flood you with links
But you wouldnt believe it because you love to argue. I have
Read your posts on here before Your annoying As ####
well considering i agreed with much of what you said i would find that difficult to believe. and im annoying because i support my opinions? there has yet to be a post in this thread which contradicts what i have said. in fact, others have chimed in and linked to articles which support what i am saying. i dont believe in he said-she said banter. if i have an opinion there is a reason for it. i will support my viewpoint. saying that you dont agree with me is meaningless without refuting the information i am providing to support my viewpoint. if you state otherwise without providing counterpoints that is the equivalent of using "because i said so" to support your argument.
Your saying obama is trying to save the firearms industry?
Was this before or after the bank bail outs?
Just completely untrue, your just repeated things you here on the news..
the thing about obama trying to save the firearms industry was sarcasm. i honestly though everyone would have understood that. next time i will use the [sarcasm][/sarcasm] tag.
date of the bank bailouts: october 3, 2008 (
http://en. wikipedia .org/wiki/Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_2008)
date which obama took office: january 20, 2009 (
http://en. wikipedia .org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States)
yup.... obama bailed out the banks. and i bet he caused the crash before he took office as well. [sarcasm]wait... not i get it.... obama is such a terrible president that he screwed up the country before he even took office. wait again.... before he was even elected (november 4, 2008).[/sarcasm]
yes i heard those things on the news. there are these things called dates which are important. so am i being annoying as sh** again because i did a 5s search in google.
-----edit-----
1) He did not say anything about a government conspiracy, but ok.
2) Why would they hire a high number of individuals to buy ammo.
Thats not smart at all, they have atf, dhs,elements of military,cia, fbi
The list goes on. Even the U.S postal service put in for a huge order of small cal. Bullets
And so did the social sercuity administration. There buying up huge amounts of ammo.
3) These are government agencies, so government funded/taxpayer funded/federal reserve funded.
This is not my opinion, the dhs is under investgation for this. Because the american people
Are not stupid and thank god there our neighbors
4) Your not applying logic to any of this, your saying conspiracy, conspiracy, conspiracy!
Type in "u.s agency's buying up ammo" there is free press, mainstream press,
Legal documents you name it. Yes, governments lie, steal and are opressive.
5) As far as budgets, no one is studying agenices budgets, yes there
In the budget but whos keeping track of them? So lets say everything looks legit
On the budget. Ok, well we know theres people who want to take away the americans guns(now ammo)
6) Alot of flithy rich industrialists, corporate scum and people who want full control list goes on.
They can support and fund it and find ways to still maintain control after the gun control debate loss.
7) Or theres black projects, dont see those on the annual bugdet. The cia has declassified
Quite a few of there taxpayer funded black projects. (Mk ultra to name one).
8) Research
1) if the government is trying to buy up mass amount of ammo to keep it from the people and this fact is trying to be hidden, it is by very definition a conspiracy.
2) given that government contracts with ammo manufacturers are public (for tax purposes of the supplier at the very least) there is a record of them and we know how many rounds they have purchased. this is a small amount of the total production. so if this amount is known and a fraction of total sales then they must be getting the ammo from the other area, retail. hence people going into stores to buy ammo.
3) yes there was a pointless investigation. in one of the articles someone else linked it said that there was an investigation and it was completely baseless.
4) see 1)
5) there are entire government committees who do nothing but go through budgets. because of the party balance most of these people are republicans. i would find it very hard to believe that republicans know about this and are doing nothing with that information.
6) a corporate conspiracy is still a conspiracy. and in general people who have that much money are interested in making more of and holding on to that money.
7) so a black project is buying all the ammo? i thought you said there was no conspiracy?
8) logic?