.223/5.56 bolt action bullpup

L

little_airwolf

BANNED
BANNED
BANNED
EE Expired
Rating - 96.4%
27   1   0
Location
Calgary
I've seen a few companies make bolt action bullpups in .308.
Just wondering if there is .223 or 5.56?
I wish we could get aftermarket bullpup stocks. Center balanced systems make great stocks!
 
Looks like there is interest in a .223/5.56 bolt action bullpup.
Wish they'd make it. The RFB is nice but too much gun for me. Plus I've seen good and bad things with the RFB.
Maybe we'll see some stuff at the Shot Show????????????????????
 
I have a bolt action bullpup in 338 Lapua.
View attachment 8657
There are caliber conversion kits for it down to .243 but not .223.


Never seen a 223 bolt action bullpup though.
If you're using it for hunting and want the better balance just don't run a heavy barrel on your hunting rifle. Balance is much improved.
I would be interested in them as well though so I'll be checking back on this thread if anyone else posts.

I'm not sure how the Canadian bullpup laws apply to bolt actions, you can't add a bullpup stock to a semi auto but a bolt action may be different. Would have to look into that. On that note, I've never seen a stock offered either.

Good luck
 
It doesn't matter if a bullpup stock is for a semi auto or a manually operated firearm; still a prohibited device.
A bullpup bolt action would be legal, if it were set up the same way that a T97 or Tavor. Can't be a barrelled action dropped into the stock.
 
Yeah you couldn't get a drop-in stock for a bolt gun, but a bullpup action would be doable. A lot of cost for a pretty limited market though, you'd need to have the whole action attached to the stock, even if you had panels on the side like the AI stocks (pistol grip and trigger area built into the action)
 
tiriaq said:
It doesn't matter if a bullpup stock is for a semi auto or a manually operated firearm; still a prohibited device.
A bullpup bolt action would be legal, if it were set up the same way that a T97 or Tavor. Can't be a barrelled action dropped into the stock.
Click to expand...

Isn't it acceptable if the firearm can fire if its removed from the stock( not that makes any sense) ? So would having the trigger attached to the stock be alright
 
Caleb314 said:
Isn't it acceptable if the firearm can fire if its removed from the stock( not that makes any sense) ? So would having the trigger attached to the stock be alright
Click to expand...

I think it's worded that it is prohib if the firearm can be fired without the stock. Makes no sense at all though since you can take a Savage or a Remington out of the stock and it will fire. Just another stupid Canadian gun law that makes no sense.
 
cr5 said:
I think it's worded that it is prohib if the firearm can be fired without the stock. Makes no sense at all though since you can take a Savage or a Remington out of the stock and it will fire. Just another stupid Canadian gun law that makes no sense.
Click to expand...

You are thinking of the Walther G22 which could be fired with the stock removed. The Firearms Center/RCMP twisted the wording and declared the stock a prohibited device and wanted them turned in. Letters were sent out to those who owned them just before the Long Gun Registry disappeared. Those that bought Walthers were free to keep them and shoot them... without the stock of course. F**king BS since the stock was designed for the Walther and not aftermarket! It's not they they could buy a new stock because that would be.... a prohibited device.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom