.223 Modified Lee Enfield

About a year ago I was reading an article on a gunsmith in Australia who was resleeving Lee-Enfields to .223. Has anyone here remember or have a copy of the article? He was doing it because of the semi auto ban there and the number of shooters who had stock piles of ammo for their Mini 14's and such.

Does anyone know of anyone in Canada who does the same sort of thing?

Thanks seadog
 
This is the article in question:

http://www.surplusrifle.com/shooting/no4223/index.asp

www.armalon.com
made a .223 conversion called the AL42, but I've never seen one for sale here.

http://www.specialinterestarms.com/
makes a 7.62x39 conversion. I'm not a fan of the round, but it's interesting.

From what I've been able to gather from surfin' the 'net, Australian International Arms was planning on a .223 version of the No4 Mk4. That may be your best bet.

I'd love to try one out. If you find someone to convert one, pls let me know.
 
The only conversions of which I am aware were for single shot DCRA style shooting, in the brief period when issue 62gr ball ammunition was available. A competent gunsmith could make up one of the Australian pattern conversions, but because of the fiddling required, the cost could be high. As an experiment, I did up a single shot conversion, with a counterbored boltface. Quite straightforeward. Basically, you need a bubba'd donor rifle for the action, a .22 barrel worth working on - preferably with at least a 1:9 twist - and either access to the tooling to do it yourself, or a friend who will help out.
 
A similar conversion was done here and the parts are still available, it was done a s 7.62 x 39 was cheap and meant no new barrel, .223 was done to prove it could be done and in essence is identical to the Australian work. As said parts are still available!
 
Just reviewed the surplusrifle.com article. For a rimless cartridge to extract and eject properly, a counterbored bolthead appears to be necessary. The author discusses adding a ring to the boltface using silver solder, and comments on the effect on temper; he suggests that brazing is too hot. Any true silver solder that I have used required red heat. Red heat is going to change any tempering that was done to the bolthead. Whether this would be a problem or not, I do not know. There are silver bearing solders which flow at a cooler temperature, but are not as strong. In addition, if a ring is added to the boltface, it may well position the case for extraction and ejection, but what would happen in the event of a casehead failure? I am sure that pieces of the ring would depart the rifle at high velocity. In the single shot experiment which I did, I counterbored the original boltface, and brought the barrel breech back to the bolthead. If I were to add a piece to the bolthead, I think that I would cut the head back, and add a cup shaped piece with a counterbored boltface. Any load on this joint would be in compression, not radial. The new piece could even have a cylindrical tang which would extend back into the bored out firing pin hole. This would increase the area for a silver bearing solder joint. A new, smaller diameter firing pin tip could be fitted to the new boltface. The barrel breech could be in its original place, the boltface being extended toward it. In a .303 rifle, there is a gap between the boltface and barrel face equivalent to the headspace. This gap is unnecessary and undesirable when a rimless round is used.
 
excellent point I never even thought of counter boreing the bolthead.


I'll have to have a look at how much meat there is before the firing pin hole opens up.

I think the article recomended a 0.100" collar so counterboring that should not be much of a problem.
 
woodchopper said:
excellent point I never even thought of counter boreing the bolthead.
I'll have to have a look at how much meat there is before the firing pin hole opens up.
I think the article recomended a 0.100" collar so counterboring that should not be much of a problem.
There is more than enough metal there to counterbore, this is how the De Lisle boltheads are modified.
 
You guys may be overthinking this.
I guess it depends what you want when you're done. If a single shot is all you need, you can just modify the normal extractor. The shell drops into the mag like the .22 Enfields.

I've got a .222 that has been converted from a .22.
Works fine. Not the most accurate, I haven't got much better than 3" at 100 yards. I download the ammo to around 2800 fps with 45 grain bullets.
I'm going to try working some loads up with the 35 grain Vmax and see how they work.

222enfield1.jpg

22Enfield2.jpg
 
I wonder what the twist is? The 35 Vmax sounds like a good idea. The Australian conversions are repeaters, and that complicates the situation considerably.
Has your boltface had a piece added to it?
 
Back
Top Bottom