.22LR Revolver

G

GIGGIDY

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
27   0   0
Location
Cardston, AB
Hi Guys,

So I figure I need a rimfire handgun, I also figure its time to get a revolver. So why don't I kill two birds with one stone: a .22lr revolver.

I would only be interested in a DA/SA revolver. No single action only guns.

So I know there is the S&W 617, I really like this gun. 10 shots, looks great, quality name, whats not to like? Maybe the price.

Any other options to look at in a DA/SA .22lr revolver?

Thanks,

Giggidy
 
taurustracker990ss.jpg


http://www.badgerarmssupply.com/index.php?page=taurus

$519... much cheaper than a S&W, but don't be confused, it is also much cheaper than a S&W ;)

Should be a fine revolver though, I had a Raging bull .44 and no issues.
 
Epps has the 617 for $849.


I have heard there is basically no warranty support for Taurus in Canada. Extremely hard to get parts if needed. Truth?
 
Just bought a new 617 and I have to say I'm underwhelmed so far. First thing I noticed is that the finish is rather dull. Definitely looks better in pictures. Also, the hammer, cylinder release, trigger and ejector rod are all quite stiff. The Hogue grips look good, but I find them a little too narrow to optimally control the gun.

OK, I can live with the finish and the operation should smooth out with use. And I can replace the grips if necessary. I just want to use it as a bullseye practice gun anyway (it's almost exactly the same size and weight as my old Model 14 .38.)

My real problems began at the range. Firing from a rest I could not achieve a 10 shot group smaller than 4 or 5 inches at 25 yds. It also shot high and right, even with the rear sight adjusted as far as it would go. Also, every shot ejected a fine spray of particulate back into my face. And after 100 rounds my hands were blackened too.

I took it to a local expert pistolsmith who's also a Smith warranty dealer. He wasn't too worried about the sights, which he said he could adjust (and which might involve a lower rear blade.) He frowned when he examined the front of the cylinder and noticed a fine coating of lead. His initial assessment was that the forcing cone is out of alignment. He thought this likely was the cause of the poor accuracy too. Anyway, it'll be in the shop for a couple of weeks.

Coming on the heels of my 15-22, which was a POS from the get go, I'm beginning to think that Smith quality control has greatly declined in recent years.

Anyway, this may all yet work out OK in the end, but if you are expecting an accurate revolver crafted with jewel like precision you may be disappointed.
 
i just bought an arminus double action 22 revolver its a older model seems well built and sturdy shoots well also great for prise paid. sure its not the quality as a s&w but not cost ether.
 
You can buy a used Model 17 for much less than a new 617. I would consider the non-lugged barrel to be a plus, too. S&Ws are pretty much the only .22 DA revolver I would seriously consider, aside from something very rare and expensive like a Korth or Manurhin.
 
GIGGIDY said:
Damn, that's not what I wanted to hear. :(
Click to expand...

OK. It's a gleaming, precision crafted firearm with a buttery action, superb balance and deadly accuracy. Better? :)

Actually that comes close to describing the old Model 14. Smith obviously did not take as much care building the 617.

Still, you never know. That one may have come off the line on Friday afternoon when the boys were already digging into the weed. There is a one year warranty, so I'm fairly optimistic it can be made right.

Friend of mine has an older, 6 shot 617. It is a nicer piece in every way. You might consider looking for a used one, or trying to find one in a shop so you can examine and handle it before purchasing. Easier said than done, I know. If you do buy a new one via net or mail just be sure to test it thoroughly and take it to a warranty shop if there are any issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom