Seems many guys will tell you the 243 is too small for them for deer. At the same time and sometimes the same breath they say its great for the ladies and youths. So I would assume that means they shoot bad. This is my gun store experience to date. I always figure bigger is better but would not hesitate to use the 243 for everything with the right bullets... bla bla bla
OP has a 30-06, so growing into something isn't really necessary. Once he gets over his flinch and gets used to the recoil of the 243 he can step back up to the 30 cal.
What do you suggest as a better choice for recoil/effectiveness though?
....243's a legitimate and humane deer gun
...i bought my daughter's high school boyfriend a 45-70 for his first rifle...my daughter bought him a Lee hand press and a pound of Unique powder...16.5 grains of Unique gave him over 400 rounds to play with...I gave him 405 grain cast bullets paper patched...that round shoots 1320 fps out of mine and has a 1.75 MOA...I shot this when we went out that fall at 100 yards in the open and his plowed through brush at 50 yards for his first nice little buck...the slug goes through a 10" poplar at 20 yards and there is NO recoil...and last I heard he has it loaded all the way up, but still prefers the Unique loads...and there is NO meat wastage...good to a couple hundred yards...and the bullet goes all the way through...even end to end...we forget the old ways so easy...just sayin'
...243 is more than enough but will never be anything more and is marginal in heavy brush
...something with a straight wall even...cowboy loads...30-30...35 Remington...44-40...there's lots out there...that's my preference anyway
...just sayin' there are other options
IMO you shouldn't shoot anything through brush, because any round can be deflected, and the predictability of that deflection is almost zero... Therefore, and "brush busting" characteristics people claim are entirely pointless to me. If I can't get a clear shot I wont take it. And I wont even touch the claim of "a couple hundred yards" for a 1300fps load...
....So, I'm looking for the truth from those who have hunted deer with this caliber - based on a clean shot from anwhere inside of 200 yds, is a .243 sufficient for every deer in my neck of the woods or not?
I knew a fellow, dead now that hunted almost exclusively with a 243. My dad hunted lots with him. Dad said this guy wounded so many deer it was disgusting. Technically you could kill a deer with a 22. Is it ethical? For all those saying a 243 is enough I say real world experience says B.S. In a perfect world sure. Hunting often presents less than perfect world shots. A 243 & a 308 don't kick that much different.
X3. No such thing as a "bush buster". All calibers deflect.

I knew a fellow, dead now that hunted almost exclusively with a 243. My dad hunted lots with him. Dad said this guy wounded so many deer it was disgusting. Technically you could kill a deer with a 22. Is it ethical? For all those saying a 243 is enough I say real world experience says B.S. In a perfect world sure. Hunting often presents less than perfect world shots. A 243 & a 308 don't kick that much different.
”real world experience says...”
”I knew a fellow...”
”Dad said...”




























