Just an update on an old thread. I said I would likely never own a .257 Weatherby . I lied and picked up a Vanguard Laserguard and must say I am really eating crow here. Reformed 7mm brass took care of expensive brass. Biggest thing about this caliber is the unbelievable accuracy. It burns a lot of powder but I am really enjoying shooting my bee.
I don't have a .257 Wby, but do have a 2506 and a .264win,
Is there anyone on here using the 257 for long range, dialing scope etc.
I know the .257 Wby fast and flat, has 200-250 fps on the 2506 and .264win, but the bullet Bc, isn't the greatest,
Anyone used both the 257 Wby and .264 win in similer rifles and picked one over the other ?
I have had a amazing streak of bang flop, one shot kills out to 350ish Meters, with the 2506 and 110gr accubond.
You can kill a moose with a .223, but that does not prove a thing about it being adequate for the purpose just because you've done it. I've seen people kill deer with 22 magnums, guess that's a perfect deer round now? The .257 is a great cartridge if kept within its capabilities but if large critters are on the menu, opt for a better suited cartridge please.
I bought a new Mark V 6 years ago and sold last year. It was an Ultralight and while I found it enjoyable to shoot at the range there were 2 drawbacks:Would you consider a 257 Weatherby for your various needs?
It was the "old school" boys who created the 257 wby (1944) and the Nosler partition bullet (1948). Roy Weatherby did not invent the 257 for moose and elk, there were other cartridge/calibers conceived for that purpose. It's prudent to pay heed to the grey haired................![]()
Would you consider a 257 Weatherby for your various needs?
I have one built on a Pre-64 M70. Well, I bought it as a donor 5 years ago and it still remains "undonored".