The .300 Win, if it were one gun for everything in NA. About the only time its a poor choice is when the shooter can't handle it.
The Dogleg is right, but then he usually is
I had something of a fascination with the .257 Wby for years, until I finally owned one. I quickly came to realize that once you get out there far enough that the flatter trajectory is helpful, you're suddenly stuck with a light bullet and some rather low energy numbers.
OK, so you think you can hit a deer at 500 yards with your .257 Wby. But how hard are you hitting it? As it turns out, it's pretty much with the same energy as the .257 Roberts at 300 yards.
Don't get me wrong, improved performance is improved performance. But in my mind, as the ranges get longer, the need for extra bullet weight and momentum increases simply as an insurance policy in case things don't go exactly as planned. In my mind, the .300 Win is indeed a long-range hunting round -- but the .257 Wby doesn't quite get there. Or rather, it gets there, but without enough wallop to make me happy.
But feel free to disagree. And if you do -- I might have a .257 Wby Vanguard for you at a good price
