Back in the late 60's and early 70's many 26 inch 30-06's were converted to magnums...
huh ? what you saying ? RJ
Back in the late 60's and early 70's many 26 inch 30-06's were converted to magnums...
Why pay to have it cut and then sell it? Why not just sell it and buy what you will want to keep?
Absolutely. I'll only cut it if I decide to keep it.
It's my first 98 action and it's a hella nice rifle.
I have a re-barreled Husquvarna in .30-06.
The barrel is a medium-contour stainless, 26 inches long, .650" diameter at the muzzle.
The rifle is a bit heavy, but not truly unwieldy.
I'm curious if there's any real advantage to a 26-inch barrel in this day and age, or whether max velocity and full powder consumption is generally achieved in 22 to 24-inch barrels?
The rifle is a real pleasure to shoot, but I've thought about trimming the barrel to 23 or 24 inches.
Second question:The rifle has a barrel purportedly made by Ted Gaillard; is there any way to verify this?
All replies appreciated, thanks in advance!
I can’t imagine running a 7mm Rem Mag or 300 Win Mag with a barrel longer than 24”. So I certainly wouldn’t run a 30-06 that way.
A 20” 300 Win Mag will always outrun a 20” 30-06 and a 20” 30-06 will always outrun a 20” 308.
A 20" 300wm will push a 180gr @ 2960 fps
a 26" 30-06 will push a 180gr @ 2900 fps
I like that.........30-06 velocity!
I’ve hardly met a barrel that I have not cut. I highly recommend it.
I would never. (Goes to show we’re all different.) Interesting how manufacturers make their magnums with long barrels. Also, longer barrels are easier to keep on target when shooting off-hand.
I would never. (Goes to show we’re all different.) Interesting how manufacturers make their magnums with long barrels. Also, longer barrels are easier to keep on target when shooting off-hand.
I would never. (Goes to show we’re all different.) Interesting how manufacturers make their magnums with long barrels. Also, longer barrels are easier to keep on target when shooting off-hand.




























