.270 Win load

Personally I'd run one of the lightest hollow point bullets you can find for the caliber.

I was running Sierra 110 grain hollow points in my 308 for deer hunting. Holy smokes did that do a nice job on white tails. Guides always commented on the minimal meat damage and obliterated internals like they never saw before.

You need to forget about the need for penetration. You'll get all the penetration you need with any center fire. What matters most for deer is that you get fast expansion. Think like you want a varmint load for the 270.

Even a 223 with 55 grainers will pass through a deer clean, so that's the least of your concerns.

Just remember that any energy left in the bullet after it passes through the animal is wasted energy. Deer are smaller than most people think, so don't go out there with a gun that is set up to kill moose when you are after White Tails. I've tracked more wounded deer that were shot with a 300 win mag than I can count, so over kill is actually less effective or even worse... ineffective.

I remember the sales guy at work paid for a deer hunt on a game farm in Michigan for a good customer who wanted to shoot a deer with his deceased brothers 300 win mag. If you could have seen the look on the sales guys face when he counted out $5000 for a deer that was not recovered. We found lots of blood, but not the deer, so he had to pay up anyway.
 
Last edited:
The 110tsx should perform great on game. The penetration you get from a mono metal bullet is very high, and they perform best with lots of velocity behind them. Guys frequently step down a weight when using them, eg 120gr in a 7mm or 150gr in a 300mag. The 110 in the 270 should punch well above what its weight would suggest.

X2 on this. 110ttsx are accurate in my rifle and extremely flat shooting at 3400fps. Don't hesitate using 110ttsx in a 270.
 
What would be the limit of 110 gr TTSX? Could these be used on elk or just white tail? I know velocity is much more important in delivering down range energy than mass of bullet is and that if I can push a 110 gr bullet as fast or faster than a 130 gr it will deliver more energy. If the 110 gr can be used on elk then I’ll probably go that route for my load work up
 
What would be the limit of 110 gr TTSX? Could these be used on elk or just white tail? I know velocity is much more important in delivering down range energy than mass of bullet is and that if I can push a 110 gr bullet as fast or faster than a 130 gr it will deliver more energy. If the 110 gr can be used on elk then I’ll probably go that route for my load work up

I have some 62 grain Remington 223 ammo that says its good for both Deer and Elk right on the box. With that in mind, I'm sure that you will be fine with 110s, as long as you hit it like an archery hunter and avoid big bones.

Biggest mistake is to hit an animal too far back regardless of ammo. Best point of aim advice I was ever given was to aim center chest between the two front legs. Regardless of angle, you will take out critical organs. Just avoid the leg if possible. Some guys have said to aim for the far leg, but that can result in a hit too far back if the animal is quartering away.

The light recoil of the 110 will also help you break a clean and accurate shot. So many people think they need ultra mag ultra heavy bullets and a 6 pound easy to carry rifle, then fear the recoil and ask other guys to sight it in for them. No surprise they never shoot well with it.

Just be confident with the above and you'll do just fine.
 
Last edited:
Use the Hornady. I'd go with 130s, but you already have the 140s.

270s are ordinary.
Deer are ordinary.
Hornadys are ordinary.

Taking an ordinary 270 and shoot an ordinary deer with an ordinary bullet will ordinarily give great results.

People get into trouble by taking extraordinary measures to do ordinary things.
 
Last edited:
Use the Hornady. I'd go with 130s, but you already have the 140s.

270s are ordinary.
Deer are ordinary.
Hornadys are ordinary.

Taking an ordinary 270 and shoot an ordinary deer with an ordinary bullet will ordinarily give great results.

People get into trouble by taking extraordinary measures to do ordinary things.

I agree with Dogleg 100%
 
A bit of history. In 1925, Winchester took the 30-06 case and 'simply' necked down the 0.308 diameter to 0.270. The 270 Win was born. At that time, it shot a 130 bullet at around 3100 fps, which the 30-06 could not match with a 150 grain bullet. Therefore the 270 was, and still is, a long range cartridge shooting a very flat 130 grain bullet. This speedy 130 was too destructive for deer at short range; a 150 grain bullet was developed for the 270 with a speed of around 2800-2850 for hunting in the woods.

More recently, speeds of around 3050 fps for the 150 grain in the 270 have been achievable with newer powders. This gives as flat a trajectory as the 130 grain. The 150 grain is a heavier bullet, it has a higher BC (better resistance to wind), and naturally a higher SD (better penetration) than the 130 grain. it is true it kicks slightly more than the 130.

Therefore, whether one wants to shoot deer only, or a combination deer/elk or even moose, the 150 grain seems a natural choice. Authors like Jack O'connor and Nathan Forster praised the 150 grain in the 270. It is even more praiseworthy now. Basically, with such speeds, the 270 with 150 grain is a magnum. And if one absolutely needs a slower speed, it can be loaded down for the woods. Nosler Partition and/or Sierra Gameking will do. Alternatively, for deer and short distance hunting, one can load down to 130 grain to around 2800-2850. With such a speed, there is not much meat destruction and it works great.

So, contrary to its initial use with a speedy 130 and a slow 150 in the 270, an informed hunter would see a big advantage for using high speed 150 and a low speed 130.
 
A bit of history. In 1925, Winchester took the 30-06 case and 'simply' necked down the 0.308 diameter to 0.270. The 270 Win was born. At that time, it shot a 130 bullet at around 3100 fps, which the 30-06 could not match with a 150 grain bullet. Therefore the 270 was, and still is, a long range cartridge shooting a very flat 130 grain bullet. This speedy 130 was too destructive for deer at short range; a 150 grain bullet was developed for the 270 with a speed of around 2800-2850 for hunting in the woods.

More recently, speeds of around 3050 fps for the 150 grain in the 270 have been achievable with newer powders. This gives as flat a trajectory as the 130 grain. The 150 grain is a heavier bullet, it has a higher BC (better resistance to wind), and naturally a higher SD (better penetration) than the 130 grain. it is true it kicks slightly more than the 130.

Therefore, whether one wants to shoot deer only, or a combination deer/elk or even moose, the 150 grain seems a natural choice. Authors like Jack O'connor and Nathan Forster praised the 150 grain in the 270. It is even more praiseworthy now. Basically, with such speeds, the 270 with 150 grain is a magnum. And if one absolutely needs a slower speed, it can be loaded down for the woods. Nosler Partition and/or Sierra Gameking will do. Alternatively, for deer and short distance hunting, one can load down to 130 grain to around 2800-2850. With such a speed, there is not much meat destruction and it works great.

So, contrary to its initial use with a speedy 130 and a slow 150 in the 270, an informed hunter would see a big advantage for using high speed 150 and a low speed 130.

interesting,
i loaded 45gr Varget an 130gor Corelots, to around 2800-2850 it worked out..... indeed the upclose stuff wasnt as violent but i took some deer at 300 and 330 meters respectively, double lungs and mostly found the projectile under the hide perfect shroom.

ive seen many Sambar / elk sized/ lost to 130gr going flat tilt at 30meters .....
for this reason i tend to have people go the 150gr CP for Sambar..... an down the track if they work out the goodness of a 130gr, they will be ready to move on to pickin their shots etc. ha ha
 
.270 Winchester and Hornady interlocks are about as a good a match as any for whitetails and mule deer(if accurate). Anyone arguing otherwise has probably been spending too much time inside and not hunting. Neither of the Barnes bullets mentioned are likely to bounce off any of the critters commonly hunted in NA. It really comes down to your personal tastes. I'd take the most accurate and go forth with tags to fill and a sharp knife happily.
 
Back
Top Bottom