- Location
- your mailbox
Most of the bit I know about SKSs I learned in a couple hours over the past two days in here. The Russian one below is registered as a Siminov Tula but I believe based on the little yield sign with zero inside I powdered on front of receiver that it is Siminov Russian State Arsenal? Please comment if you know for sure. I guess it doesn’t matter as all the numbers are a little crooked, no lettering on side of slide, buttstock re-serialed, large rivet pin. There is a faint “Z in box” on top centre of slide.
As for the Chinese one I had the Chinese lettering on receiver translated definitively to “five six style”. It has 306 in a triangle just befor that Chinese lettering and I see people in here calling that a model. It is registered as a Norinco. What is most accurate way to characterize this piece? The mag is pinned at bottom with small rivet.
Please comment if you agree the Chinese one is new not refurbished based on:
All numbers are straight and appear original to me.
Metal finish appears original to me (have experience with old Winchesters).
Lastly, as Russian pieces seem to trump Chinese in here, is one of these pieces more desirable than the other? Based on my own homework I see it as a refurb Russian vs a new Chinese. The wood is certainly soft on the latter. The bores and boltfaces are great on both.
Thanks for your comments so far. No offense, guess you know by the proofmarks but since not explained I'll wait for a second opinion as confirmation before calling it an Izzy as I wouldn't want to misrepresent it to anyone.
As for the Chinese one I had the Chinese lettering on receiver translated definitively to “five six style”. It has 306 in a triangle just befor that Chinese lettering and I see people in here calling that a model. It is registered as a Norinco. What is most accurate way to characterize this piece? The mag is pinned at bottom with small rivet.
Please comment if you agree the Chinese one is new not refurbished based on:
All numbers are straight and appear original to me.
Metal finish appears original to me (have experience with old Winchesters).
Lastly, as Russian pieces seem to trump Chinese in here, is one of these pieces more desirable than the other? Based on my own homework I see it as a refurb Russian vs a new Chinese. The wood is certainly soft on the latter. The bores and boltfaces are great on both.
Thanks for your comments so far. No offense, guess you know by the proofmarks but since not explained I'll wait for a second opinion as confirmation before calling it an Izzy as I wouldn't want to misrepresent it to anyone.
Last edited:


















































