762nato said:You get other benifits, reduced bolt thrust, ....
Andy said:That has never been proven, unless you go back to Ackley's "experiments" and accept his hypothesis verbatim (and he was biased).
Bolt thrust is based on the product of the inside area of the casehead and the pressure. In a dry chamber, the cartridge body will firmly grip the chamber walls, and only the unsupported part will have the freedom to stretch and exert force against the bolt. The notion that tapered cartridges will "squirt" out of the chamber is in my opinion nonsense.
Casull said:I disagree with the idea that case thrust from tapered cases in nonesense. Rechamber a few of the big old tapered cases like .45/70, .45/90, .45/120, .50/70, .50/90 and .50/140 and you will see case head thrust become very real. Now, that is a whole different size and shape than a .30/06 to .30/06 AI for sure, but the principle is the same, just smaller effects.
If you dont mind the low BC I would agree, if you are shooting a little farther away the 200 will easily out perform the 220. I have owned several AI calibers, in the 22 250 the velocity increase is 200fps with a 55 gr. I am or was happy with all of them.I think the 220 will kill just as fast and penetrate a little further.
prosper said:instead of a 30-06 improved, consider a 30 gibbs
bingo1010 said:might have to, just looking for something to better the performance of the 30-06 in a mountain rig. thanks for the fresh idea
Hi-Standard said:Assuming you handload, the old 30-06 is the ballistic equivalent to factory 7mm Remington magnum, with a vast selection of bullet weights to choose from. I don't see why you need to improve her![]()
bingo1010 said:might have to, just looking for something to better the performance of the 30-06 in a mountain rig. thanks for the fresh idea