- Location
- The Conservative part of Ontario
I have never seen the need to take a gun, such as a Model 94 Winchester, apart to clean. I have heard too many stories about gunsmiths getting a box of pieces to put back together. I have assisted a gunsmith putting together a 94, in a case of where four hands are better than two, and was glad I was not on my own! By the way, a pre 64 is trickier than a post 64.
Browning didn't want the owners taking apart their FN shotguns, so they used very small screws, hard to get out, in an attempt to discourage the home "craftsman."
I think I have the absolute perfect example of why it is not necessary to take a rifle apart for cleaning. I bought a 1894 30 WCF, which was made in 1908 and purchased new by a rancher. The rifle stayed in the hands of the family of ranchers until I bought it last fall, from the last of the ranching family. That 30-30 had spent all but the last twenty years of its life as a working rifle with cowboys on horses on BC ranches. I got with it a very well use leather scabbard.
The rifle shows lots of use, has little, if any bluing left, the stock is well scuffed but not gouged and there is no rust on the rifle. The bore would rate between good and very good.
And here is the kicker. Every screw that Winchester put in the rifle is still there and not one single screw shows any indication, whatsoever, that it has ever been out of the rifle!
The action worked nice, so I took it to the range to shoot. It also shot fine and cycled well. I later squirted solvent into the action and blew it out with an airgun and oiled it. But no, it has still never had a screw out of it and it is just as smooth, easy working action as any 94 I have used.
So if it could spend about 80 years as a working ranch rifle without cleaning, don't tell me your rifle has to be taken apart to clean after a fall of hunting use!
Actually, last year at the moose camp i took apart a friends 1894 for the first time "ever" It had got so tight it was hard to work the action. It still did work, and shot fine, just stiff. Hunting camp tools being what they are, the disassembly did not include the bolt, however, the action was stripped, as well as the tube mag. I think the improvement was well worth the effort. The old 94's are very smooth rifles.
Me, I've had my rifle apart many times, and probably could do it blindfolded. However, for a person who is not given to mechanical things,the action can prove challenging. It's no where near the 88 Winchester, or even the '86, for complexity, but it can give a neophyte a headache.
I scraped probably close to a teaspoon of clay like material from his old gun much of it from the bolt slides, but also from the walls of the receiver, the magazine plug and all those tight little crevices that hold gunk. The hammer and trigger mechanism were a wonder. (wonder they worked that is) It was his great grandfathers rifle. Not a mark on the screws. (still isn't)





















































