Here is a nice article on the .338 Federal
https://www.outdoorlife.com/story/hunting/338-federal-best-deer-cartridge-youve-never-tried/
https://www.outdoorlife.com/story/hunting/338-federal-best-deer-cartridge-youve-never-tried/
Here is a nice article on the .338 Federal
https://www.outdoorlife.com/story/hunting/338-federal-best-deer-cartridge-youve-never-tried/
On paper there is nothing to hate. I was going to build a Stag-10 in .338 but didn't source a receiver set before the BS happened.
When this cartridge came out several years ago I thought it was going to be a winner. Sako/Tikka were one of the first companies to chamber this round and we stocked up with guns and ammo. Well it was one of the few buying mistakes we made early in our business and we sold a few at first but sat on the initial inventory for quite some time. I even won a Sako in this caliber at a dealer show but I sold it at a deep discount after it sat on the shelf for quite some time. We still carry a little ammo but we would be unlikely to order in a new gun for inventory only. Phil.
What rifle are you shooting the .338 fed in 45ACP?
Interesting take on it.
I always thought it was a neat round, but I probably wouldn't get one. The 180gr accubond @ 2700fps would be a great load for deer, but the sectional density kinda blows - only .225, which is basically the same as a 150gr 30cal pill. If I want a bigger-than-30 cal gun, I'd want to step it up in case capacity too, but I have no reason to be constrained to the 308-sized case (unlike people building bcl102s and such).
certainly has handled the biggest in Aus, i took a few Buffalo Bulls with it in the Northern Country! its done a feral horse or two and wouldnt mind a CamerlWhelanLad, your 35 Whelan will take any animal you might come across where you hunt, IMHO. I certainly wouldn't feel the least bit undergunned with it.