The only downfall to the .358 family of ammo is that there isnt as many options for bullets as say the .338 or .375 and there tends to be more blunt or round nosed ammunition.
I suppose - if that is how you consider the 338Win and the 358 Norma also. It's a closer cousin to them than the 35Whelen in terms of velocity, power levels and trajectorys. My idea is the opposite - it's my looonger ranging 35cal. 225grs at 2900 and 250grs at 2740 are not particularly pedestrian levels IMO and carry lots of energy to 400yds. Wouldn't know for sure what blitzkreik speed is - ?I like the Idea of it but more as a stalking round than anything.. eg Not loaded up at blitzkreik speed but rather a hot Whelen or something...
Here ya go - my 35/300SWSM - 250s at 2740, 225s at 2900 with a 22" barrel - I like - http://35cal.com/ruger77_350wsm.html
Not much of an issue any more - no significant downfall IMO - .358" options galore these days - 125gr thru 310grs. Accubonds, TTSX and even SpeerHCs, Grand Slams, Partitions and HornadySPs are not blunt nose. But FNs and RNs work well for many purposes. The 280 Swift (semi-spitzer) and 310 Woodleighs are a case in point.
In my case you're preaching to the choir on that - my 350WSM was birthed in just that way.Easiest way to go is rechambering a Ruger in .350 Rem Mag.
Absolutely so IMO also - though even MORE options like Bergers et al would be nice of course.At the distance (<500 yds) and for the use a .350 WSM (elk, moose and big bears) would most likely be used, high BC and boat tail bullets at far from necessary.
There's lots of bullets out there in 35cal, more than enough for any shooter to choose a couple weights which is the norm for any cal anyways.The only downfall to the .358 family of ammo is that there isnt as many options for bullets as say the .338 or .375 and there tends to be more blunt or round nosed ammunition.
Wouldn't know for sure what blitzkreik speed is - ?




























