35 Bullets

Hi,
My 358 Win and 35 Whelen have dropped 25 Moose, 2 elk and several Deer with only one shot each and occasionally a second shot for insurance.
Those big bullets sure anchor Moose and Elk effectively.
I think that the bullets that came apart hit a rib on the way in. I like lung shots if the animal is moving and neck shots if it is standing still. Less meat damage that way and I have many mouths to feed.
You do very well dropping caribou like that!
I'd like to drop a Caribou sometime(and a bear too).
Hope to get one or two Elk this year and a Moose.
The only time my Moose have hooves in the air is when I get them into my truck, not quite so dramatic as your caribou!
I'm also looking for a BLR in .284 that I can hotrod to 35-284.
Too much fun!
John
 
Takujualuk said:
Despite a nagging bedding problem that is driving me crazy the 358 Norma Ruger has been a fine test bed for 35 caliber bullets. I have pretty much finished a test of 35's started a year ago and some people in this forum leant me bullets.
Interesting tests! I've owned and hunted with a Husqvarna Featherweight in .358 Norma Magnum since 1974. I don't know how many Husqvarna made of them - because as you note, featherweight rifles weighing in at a tad under eight problems all up get quite "lively" when you pull the go-switch... They are an oddity in that they have a 26" barrel - in a lightweight mountain rifle, and in a caliber where expansion ratio suggests not much will be gained by throwing the extra length on there. I never could quite bring myself to chop 4" or so off it - my reward is the top velocities I get (if that ever becomes super important to me, I guess).

Other .35's in the house are a .35 Brown-Whelan and a couple of .358 BLR's. I hunt with a 30-06 or a 30/40 or whatever once moose and elk season is closed, the bears have gone to bed, and it's just deer left open - but the wife still carries her BLR all year round. Only rifle in the world, as far as she is concerned.

Few general comments after reading your research.

You mentioned the 225 gr. X bullet "acted like a heavy" so you included it there. I agree with that view - after seeing the results of the 225 gr. a couple of times, I went to the 225 gr. X bullet and have never bothered looking at anything else since (although the new 225 TSX looks tempting...). Back before they became available, it was the 250 grain Nosler Partition - never done me wrong, but comparing the results in other calibers made me switch everything to the Barnes X bullets.

I have never had much luck with Hornady and Speer bullets on elk and moose, as far as performance goes. Mind you, that goes back to the 70's and no doubt there have been improvements since then, but... once burned, twice shy.

The Ballistic Tips do come apart quit easily, and Nosler has known that for quite a while - I had a conversation with Chub Eastman (? right name) of Nosler shortly after they came out. Mentioned we had shot a couple of elk with them that season and the bullets all came apart. He said Nosler didn't expect them to hold together like a Partition - but then asked me if the elk died or not. I got his point about the Ballistic Tips, but never loaded them for anything other than deer or antelope after that. They were the BC kings of the day when they first came out, but that wasn't my #1 Priority...

The BLR's seem to be quite happy with the 180 grain X bullet, the velocities in the Barnes manual are most impressive (equally importantly, easily achieved with accuracy), and not only do they perform as expected but turn the .358 into a genuine 300 yard class hunting rifle - providing the hunter has the skill, of course. It is perfect for women and kids - lots of power and burning less powder for the same or better velocity in that weight of bullet than the .308/30-06 alternatives. Meaning less recoil... a fair number of local hunters think it is "a little light" for elk and moose around here... why I have no idea, because they think a .308 or a 30/06 with a 180 grain bullet is just fine and they are practically the ballistic twins of the .358 Winchester with the same bullet.

The 200gr. X-bullet that you mentioned was to be the intended candidate for the wife's rifle - but with the performance of the 180 grainers on an elk at a GPS'd 290 yards away ( a quartering shot)... based on that once case I decided that was all the performance (and recoil) she needed.

If the 200 grainer IS discontinued, it looks like that is news to Barnes or they aren't paying attention: it is listed in their catalogue.

For those willing to put the time in and who like heavier bullets, if ~ 2600 fps is fast enough for you with a 250 grain bullet, I think you might find that a good cast bullet loaded by somebody who knows what they are about can probably be equalled for performance, but it is hard to beat. The .358 Win carbines stoked with a 250 gr. heat treated bullets from a custom Mountain Molds product and that big flat meplat do a most impressive job inside and leave big holes on their way out. Not very scientific, no penetration measured (aside from "holes on both sides"...), but they do a hell of a job. Sufficient enough that my "bear load' for huckleberry picking excursions is a magazine full of those puppies cast out of pure lead and paper patched - the shorter bullet does not take up the powder space the 250 X bullet or even a Partition would take. Not a long range load by any stretch of the imagination, but will easily hold "minute of bear" (or "minute of pissed off moose" even more likely) when it counts.

I am not a cast bullet radical, but in some cases - particularly with stubby cartridges in bigger calibers that can have limited powder space with bigger bullets - they can hold their own with the jacketed offerings quite easily and arguably even surpass them.

Anyways, enjoying your stuff - didn't realize there were so many of us out there with .358 Norma Magnums. I also have a .35 Newton, but until I get around to making some cases, I won't be doing much shooting with the few cases I have left for it. Pity Remington or somebody else wouldn't bring it out for a year as a "classic cartridge".
 
Rick I may have jumped to a conclusion about the Barnes 200 grain as they tend to add and drop bullets with great abandon and my Barnes # 3 no longer had data for them. Maybe they brought it back?

I have the blue 225's shooting into 1 " groups in my 350 Rem Mag so I expect Barnes to discontinue them. :D

I have my full article re my test trials about to be published at http://www.35cal.com/

Should be under articles when the formatting is done. Pretty good all around info about 35's there. Thanks for the comments and feed back. I am still learning.
 
Takujualuk said:
I have the blue 225's shooting into 1 " groups in my 350 Rem Mag so I expect Barnes to discontinue them.
I never tried the coated jobs - although I was tempted. Suspicions led to conversations with Barnes, along the lines of "So... shooting groups with an unfouled barrel... how do these coated bullets do for accuracy? Answer was "lots of people find they get much poorer groups until the barrel is fouled". As I always hunt and develop loads for a clean barrel with a very sparse wipe of CLP or whatever, I didn't pursue that further.

I have my full article re my test trials about to be published at http://www.35cal.com/
Man, a website dedicated to the .35's... you're more sold on them than I am! My brother only has one .35, but it is a .358 STA... it really throws them out there. But weighs more than my Norma. The recoil is somewhat lighter, but only because he has a dragon call installed on it, and I despise those things and won't have a rifle with one.

However, it knocks down elk and moose in MOST impressive fashion...

I'll go have a look at your website...
 
Takujualuk said:
Should be under articles when the formatting is done. Pretty good all around info about 35's there. Thanks for the comments and feed back. I am still learning.
One thing I was going to mention after reading the articles was Paco Kelly's love of the really heavy Lyman cast bullet in the .35's. I think it is #3589/#358009 - same bullet; just different stock/catalogue numbers. I have never quite understood that one, myself. Kelly has a LOT of first hand experience knocking over critters in Africa and North America, more than I do, but I am still going to differ with him on this somewhat.

It is not too difficult to get a 250 grain cast bullet with a tin can size meplat up to 2600 fps out of a .358 Winchester or faster - without leading and with accuracy, if you know what you're doing. (hint: for those who think this is tough, join the Cast Bullet Association - invaluable). That's faster than you can drive those heavy Lymans, and maybe more importantly, the 250 grainers from LBT and RCBS have nice big flat meplates that the Lyman doesn't have.

If the point of the exercise is to throw all ballistic efficiency out the window and ask just how much energy can be generated from a .35 (or any caliber) in any given case, then I guess you get something like QuickLoad and play "what if", doing iterative scenarios with increasingly heavier bullets until you get to so heavy that muzzle energy starts decreasing. Take the heaviest bullet that produces the most muzzle energy, get a near wadcutter design for it, and you're set I guess...

I think 250 grains is good - it has worked for me out of the BLR just fine. I started with the LBT 250 grainer; a fine bullet and available again (I think) since Veral was released from jail regarding his tax protest and is in business again. A friend then had a custom mould made in 250 grains: better yet, with the aforementioned "tin can" front meplate. It is a truncated cone, two band design - very easy to get to perform well, and a real knock down artist.

So that works for me as far as big heavy bullets for hunting in .35's go: nice balance of some ballistic efficiency and swat.

The nice thing about the cast bullet world is that fine custom moulds are now dirt cheap to get. Everyone with an interest in custom bullet moulds should check out http://www.mountainmolds.com/. $75 for a two cavity custom bullet mould turned from brass is ridiculously cheap - very little over off the shelf, in fact.

And IF you like playing "what if" and are thinking of a heavy bullet for some .35 or other, check out the online mould design feature. Awesome... in five minutes, playing around while writing this, I designed a two band, two groove, gas check, no crimp groove truncated cone design with meplat 80% of bore diameter that would weigh 300 grains cast from wheelweight. Thought I could save it as "under construction" for others to view, but that feature of his website is not enabled yet. Looked so good I nearly checked the "buy it now!" box...

Anyways, go play around there and have some fun. I have yet to talk with or read of anyone complaining about the quality of his moulds (i.e. if you make a stupid design that is unlikely to do well, that's not his fault). The ones I have and have seen are all absolutely first class. I recommend anyone thinking of a bullet mould buy some from him fast - eventually he is going to realize he could sell them just as fast while charging twice the price. I think he knows that now, but it is still a labour of love with him... Incidentally... he's a hunter too, so most if not all of his mould designs and mould making is oriented towards what kind of cast bullets perform well on game.

And he's one hell of a nice guy to talk to!

Current delivery for mould orders if four weeks...
____________________________________________

Example values to plug in for starters (a lot of selection windows will auto-fill):

Select 35 caliber bullets option, in the page that opens, change the following existing values to these:
Weight: 300 grains
Allowy: wheel weights
Bullet Design: Ogival Flat Point
Crimp Groove: NO crimp groove
Meplat: 80%
Base: .3415 Straight shank for hornady-Gator 35, 3.3 gr.
Length of Base or Shank: .100"
GtoB: .3
Select second row of table (i.e. 2 body bands, two grooves): Band Length set to .20"
Down at the bottom... Ogive Radius: set to 1.95"

Click "Draw" beside the "two bands, two grooves" row in the table.

Note that this isn't a "perfect" online design tool; many settings reset themselves or change settings when you change something else. But that is a niggling detail, and this is a most impressive design tool. A little trial and error and you should have it figured out. But those settings will get you started on what your idea of a heavy .35 caliber bullet should be.
 
Good info here. I don't use the 200 gr in any of my 35's (358 Win, 350 Rem Mag, 35 Whelen, and 358 Norma), I found they came apart too easily (this was pre X bullets). In the 225's, I like the Sierra best so far (accuracy, and it works well on deer size game), although I've had good results with the X bullet in the 350 (deer, moose, bison). In the 358 NM, I only use the 250's, and here my nod goes to the Partition. I think I'll have to give some of those North Folks a try tho'. FWIW - dan
 
One correction of mistaken identity theft.... that 35 caliber site ( http://www.35cal.com/) is not mine. It belongs to and is the property of a good Ontario lad. He will be publishing my article on 35 bulletsand has compiled a pile of good stuff on 35's.

Sorry for the misunderstanding.
 
My 35 Whelen(Rem 7600) likes the Hornady 250 gr SP with an appropriate charge of RL15 and measured velocity is 2600 to 2650 fps.
The first 3 shots measure about .75" center to center.

My 358 Win(Browning BLR) likes the Sierra 225 gr BT with an appropriate charge of IMR 4895 and measured velocity is 2550 fps +/-
The first 3 shots measure about 1.25" center to center.

The 35 Whelen has a little more power and range than the 358 Win.
Both the 35 Whelen and the 358 Win have been very effective on moose and elk for me.
My longest measured shot was 375 yds to a one shot kill on a moving cow moose. I dropped a moose calf a little further away than that, but was unable to measure the distance.
I'm impressed with the performance that the 35 Whelen has to offer both in terms of power and range.
All that on a necked up 30-06 case!
I would like to try cast bullets sometime.
So much to do and so little time.
Good Luck
John
 
Takujualuk - Appreciate the clarification on the website thing. This thread has given me a boost to get back at formatting your bullet study to publish it. Life has been getting in the way lately (hunting too). Should be soon though.

JohnnyJ - got the great pics U sent of your three downed moose. Your pics and comments above again prove (at least to me anyway) that the 35 Whelen in a pump (or any action) gun is a 300 yard PLUS moose gun when loaded up to its full safe potential. That Rem 7600/35 Whelen looks so good I just bought one for myself. I'll take delivery when I get it paid for. The gun shop's agreed to let me buy it on installments so the wife and kids can continue having three squares a day.
 
Whelan: No worries.

I have been testing the 250 Speer Grandslam and this looks like a good one so far. When I reassemble the Norma I'll ratchett the speed up and see how it does. In 350 Rem Mag it might become a favourite as it is pretty short for it's weight.

If I can see a damn moose I'll have some extra data but so far I am not doing so well.
 
Back
Top Bottom