You could allways buy the 9.3x57 and have it rechambered to 9.3x62. Which is a much more effective round than the .35 Whelen.ratherbefishin said:I'm wondering in practical terms given the scarcity of the 35whelen,if a 9.3x57 is a practical alternative.Tradex has several Huskvarna's in that chambering for around $300
Maybe he's talking about the availability of the rifles themselves at that price point.ratherbefishin said:I'm wondering in practical terms given the scarcity of the 35whelen,if a 9.3x57 is a practical alternative.Tradex has several Huskvarna's in that chambering for around $300
ratherbefishin said:yes-I was refering to the availabilty of rifles-Tradex has a few of Huskvarna 9.3x57 -bolt action 35 whelens are scarce
ratherbefishin said:if the 9.3x57 is effective and closely matches the 35whelen,which I understand is a very efficient round,-why rechamber it to 9.3x62?My main concern is obtaining factory ammunition,I don;t shoot a lot nor do I reload-but would plan use the rifle strictly for my annual moose hunt
ratherbefishin said:nice bull!I'm just at a loss to figure out why the 35's aren't far more popular than they are-even Ruger dropped the 350 magnum in it's allweather model which I would have thought is as good as it gets for a tough functional hunting rifle for moose/bear,and they don;t even chamber a 35 whelen[not sure if anyone does].I understand the 358 is the replacement-Is it as efficient?
beretta boy said:Remington has lots of 35 Whelen bolt rifles.
Lots of ammunition for them too !
ratherbefishin said:if the 9.3x57 is effective and closely matches the 35whelen,which I understand is a very efficient round,-why rechamber it to 9.3x62?My main concern is obtaining factory ammunition,I don;t shoot a lot nor do I reload-but would plan use the rifle strictly for my annual moose hunt




























