troyski2 said:
As is mine. I had heard is was very good as a deep woods deer rifle. Do you think the .35 would offer any significant advantage in brush penetration over a .308 or a .30-06?
If you mean by wood penetration, the bullet staying on the right path when encountering small branches, etc, then the answer is yes but would it be significant?
You just have to assume an extreme situation where one would use a large cannon with the end result that it would take more than a little branch to deflect the bullet. On the other hand, if one were to use a 22 LR with enough velocity, the amount of energy required to deflect this bullet would be considerably less that the cannon. One could argue that the
difference in the amount of energy required to deflect a 308, 30-07 or 35 Whelen bullet would not be enough to be overly concerned.
If we agree that the amount of energy that a bullet has while in flight will be the factor on how easily it will be to deflect it then all that we need to do is compare the different calibers. I'm listing some typical data on the 30-06 and the 35 Whelen to support my argument.
30-06
Bullet wt - 220 gr and recommended as a brush/wood load
Velocity - 2450 ft/sec
ME - 2940 ft-lb
35 Whelen
Bullet wt - 220 gr
Velocity - 2740 ft/sec
ME - 3667 ft-lb
This is a difference of approx 25% in energy in favour of the 35 Whelen.
The 358 is somewhat lower than the 35 Whelen but higher than the 30-06.
Duke1
PS. It should be emphasized that the 35 Whelen cartridge is an improved version of the 30-06 (you can use the 30-06 case for loading) and initialy introduced to hunt all North American big game. It only needs a standard action but has magnum caliber capability. Although not very popular for a number of years, it is seen more frequently in the last couple of years.