350 Rem Mag and TAC?

Cletus26

Member
Super GunNutz
Rating - 100%
48   0   0
Location
Edmonton
Recently picked up a Model 7 CDL in 350 Rem Mag. Read some good things about Ramshot TAC powder in the 350. Wondering if anyone has load data or experience using Sierra Gameking 225gn SBT’s. Or other load data for the Gamekings. Couldn’t find any for the 350 from Sierra.
 
Code:
Cartridge          : .[B]350 Rem. Mag[/B].
Bullet             : .358, [B]225, Sierra SPBT[/B] 2850
Useable Case Capaci: 59.315 grain H2O = 3.851 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
[B]Barrel Length      : 20.0 inch[/B] = 508.0 mm
Powder             : [COLOR=#ff0000][B]Ramshot TAC[/B][/COLOR]

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-10.0   88    51.75   2309    2663   46532   7631     91.2    1.136
-09.0   89    52.33   2333    2720   47851   7727     91.6    1.123
-08.0   90    52.90   2358    2778   49214   7823     92.1    1.110
-07.0   91    53.48   2383    2836   50622   7917     92.5    1.097
-06.0   92    54.05   2407    2895   52077   8009     93.0    1.084
-05.0   93    54.63   2432    2955   53581   8100     93.4    1.072
-04.0   94    55.20   2457    3015   55136   8190     93.8    1.059
-03.0   95    55.78   2481    3076   56744   8278     94.2    1.047  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0   96    56.35   2506    3138   58406   8364     94.6    1.034  ! Near Maximum !
-01.0   97    56.93   2531    3201   60126   8448     94.9    1.022  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0   98    57.50   2556    3264   61905   8530     95.3    1.010  ! Near Maximum !
+01.0   99    58.08   2581    3327   63746   8611     95.7    0.998  ! Near Maximum !
+02.0   99    58.65   2606    3392   65652   8689     96.0    0.987  [COLOR=#ff0000]!DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE![/COLOR]
+03.0  100    59.23   2631    3457   67626   8766     96.3    0.975  [COLOR=#ff0000]!DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE![/COLOR]
+04.0  101    59.80   2656    3523   69670   8840     96.6    0.964  [COLOR=#ff0000]!DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE![/COLOR]
+05.0  102    60.38   2680    3590   71788   8912     96.9    0.952  [COLOR=#ff0000]!DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
[/COLOR]
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba     98    57.50   2675    3574   71689   8606     99.1    0.955  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba     98    57.50   2407    2894   52547   8126     88.6    1.079
 
Code:
Cartridge          : .[B]350 Rem. Mag[/B].
Bullet             : .358, [B]225, Sierra SPBT[/B] 2850
Useable Case Capaci: 59.315 grain H2O = 3.851 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
[B]Barrel Length      : 20.0 inch[/B] = 508.0 mm
Powder             : [COLOR=#ff0000][B]Ramshot TAC[/B][/COLOR]

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-10.0   88    51.75   2309    2663   46532   7631     91.2    1.136
-09.0   89    52.33   2333    2720   47851   7727     91.6    1.123
-08.0   90    52.90   2358    2778   49214   7823     92.1    1.110
-07.0   91    53.48   2383    2836   50622   7917     92.5    1.097
-06.0   92    54.05   2407    2895   52077   8009     93.0    1.084
-05.0   93    54.63   2432    2955   53581   8100     93.4    1.072
-04.0   94    55.20   2457    3015   55136   8190     93.8    1.059
-03.0   95    55.78   2481    3076   56744   8278     94.2    1.047  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0   96    56.35   2506    3138   58406   8364     94.6    1.034  ! Near Maximum !
-01.0   97    56.93   2531    3201   60126   8448     94.9    1.022  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0   98    57.50   2556    3264   61905   8530     95.3    1.010  ! Near Maximum !
+01.0   99    58.08   2581    3327   63746   8611     95.7    0.998  ! Near Maximum !
+02.0   99    58.65   2606    3392   65652   8689     96.0    0.987  [COLOR=#ff0000]!DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE![/COLOR]
+03.0  100    59.23   2631    3457   67626   8766     96.3    0.975  [COLOR=#ff0000]!DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE![/COLOR]
+04.0  101    59.80   2656    3523   69670   8840     96.6    0.964  [COLOR=#ff0000]!DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE![/COLOR]
+05.0  102    60.38   2680    3590   71788   8912     96.9    0.952  [COLOR=#ff0000]!DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
[/COLOR]
Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba     98    57.50   2675    3574   71689   8606     99.1    0.955  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba     98    57.50   2407    2894   52547   8126     88.6    1.079

Thanks. What would make such a difference in the amount of powder and velocity for the same weight of projectile compared with the Barnes 225 TSX?

9FD505FC-24AB-4B5C-8E14-F09F51DC012F.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 9FD505FC-24AB-4B5C-8E14-F09F51DC012F.jpg
    9FD505FC-24AB-4B5C-8E14-F09F51DC012F.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 192
Maybe Quickload's default case capacity of 72 grains h2O for the 350RM is conservative? 62grs TAC under a 225gr TSX @ 2.8" would be 114% load density, according to QL

To get 103% LD, case capacity has to be increased to 77.75grs h2O (8% increase). Maybe measure some of your fired casings to see how much water they hold. Weigh fired cases empty, fill with water to the top, and weigh again. Subtract the difference in weight to get the net h2O capacity

QL suggests only 2500ish FPS will be made with TAC w/ 225gr TSX from a 20" barrel, not sure how Barnes is getting 2764 fps. That is basically 24" 338 Win Mag velocity
 
Maybe Quickload's default case capacity of 72 grains h2O for the 350RM is conservative? 62grs TAC under a 225gr TSX @ 2.8" would be 114% load density, according to QL

To get 103% LD, case capacity has to be increased to 77.75grs h2O (8% increase). Maybe measure some of your fired casings to see how much water they hold. Weigh fired cases empty, fill with water to the top, and weigh again. Subtract the difference in weight to get the net h2O capacity

QL suggests only 2500ish FPS will be made with TAC w/ 225gr TSX from a 20" barrel, not sure how Barnes is getting 2764 fps. That is basically 24" 338 Win Mag velocity

Just weighed one and got 73.7 gn of water.
 
Finally got time to test for pressure. Was able to exceed 62 gr of TAC behind a 225 SGK at 2.800 coal. Accuracy node seamed to be around 61 grains. At 61.5 and up each .2 gr increase started being way high followed by way low. Have 5 groups of 5 built at 60.8-61.2 at 0.1 grain increments. Hopefully get back out in 2 weeks to test them.
 
Maybe measure some of your fired casings to see how much water they hold. Weigh fired cases empty, fill with water to the top, and weigh again. Subtract the difference in weight to get the net h2O capacity

It's easier to just zero the scale with the case. If it reads "xx.xx" grains then that is the capacity. I see he only did one, it's wise to average at least a few. Stuff like that can really dial in the accuracy of loading programs.
 
Just a note on the Sierra GK in 35cal, I have tried them in a 35 Whelen and in a 358norma.
They were exceptionally explosive.
Like throwing a hand grenade in the chest of a white tail doe explosive.
Since changed to 250GR Hornady Interlock and 200gr accubond.
Just my observations.
I would not run them again after 2 deer and one moose, it was the exact same results. Dead animals but lots of meat loss.
 
Just a note on the Sierra GK in 35cal, I have tried them in a 35 Whelen and in a 358norma.
They were exceptionally explosive.
Like throwing a hand grenade in the chest of a white tail doe explosive.
Since changed to 250GR Hornady Interlock and 200gr accubond.
Just my observations.
I would not run them again after 2 deer and one moose, it was the exact same results. Dead animals but lots of meat loss.

Interesting. I have 225gr Nosler partitions as well. I originally thought I had an accuracy node at 56.2gr when I had my max test string at 58 gr. Made 5 of each SGK and NP’s at 56.2gr of TAC. Accuracy of both was around 2moa a 100yards but identical POI. My plan was to use SGK for deer and the Partitions for larger game. Might just use the game kings for target practice and the Partitions for all hunting application if the POI and accuracy is the same or similar enough at the final load.
 
BACBCE8E-F766-4E45-A662-8A8B3487B7BB.jpg
WW,748 and IMR-4320 I would also recommend.

I have some loaded up with W748 to test as well. Seemed to be about 1.5-2” was about the best I was finding with TAC. Speed was around 2700-2750fps but would like a little tighter group if I can.
 

Attachments

  • BACBCE8E-F766-4E45-A662-8A8B3487B7BB.jpg
    BACBCE8E-F766-4E45-A662-8A8B3487B7BB.jpg
    73.7 KB · Views: 43
When I had my M600 it absolutely loved...a full charge of IMR-4320 over a 250gr Speer Spitzer.

Would do sub MOA if shooter could hang onto the recoil...lol.

That combo was the "hammer of Thor" on Moose....and very little meat damage surprisingly.
 
Back
Top Bottom