I have heard on multiple occasions that a .357 is the best "One Stop Pop" for your money. My father is a proponent of the .357. He raves about the combination of power and accuracy as well as the ability to crank off devastating rounds from his S&W 686 quicker then his other "Bad-Boy" the .44 Ruger Redhawk. I read a link somewhere, that used a lot of math and physics, which seemed to back what "Dad'io " was talken about. In my mind....and my wife's mind, bigger is better (OK how you use it is important for all you uuuhhh, shall we say, guys blessed with a 9mm at home).
I countered my father's opinion with the above idea that the .44 "Dirty Harry" is a bigger bullet= bigger hole= more ability for dirt nap! He countered my thought with the : "If bigger hole is better for home defense, then .4o Cal is better then .357, and .44 is better then .40 Cal, and .45 is better then .44 and the BEST Home defense must be the .50 Cal S&W elephant gun.
http://www.smith-wesson.com/wcsstore/SmWesson/upload/images/firearms/163501_large.jpg
He felt the the combination of accurately releasing the .357 125 jhp in quick succession made his 686 the best. I'm still wrestling with the idea. What do you guys think about the effectiveness of the .357 vs the .44 for home defense????
sw
I countered my father's opinion with the above idea that the .44 "Dirty Harry" is a bigger bullet= bigger hole= more ability for dirt nap! He countered my thought with the : "If bigger hole is better for home defense, then .4o Cal is better then .357, and .44 is better then .40 Cal, and .45 is better then .44 and the BEST Home defense must be the .50 Cal S&W elephant gun.
http://www.smith-wesson.com/wcsstore/SmWesson/upload/images/firearms/163501_large.jpg
He felt the the combination of accurately releasing the .357 125 jhp in quick succession made his 686 the best. I'm still wrestling with the idea. What do you guys think about the effectiveness of the .357 vs the .44 for home defense????
sw


















































