Moose Masher
CGN Regular
- Location
- Oak Hammok Manitoba
The only real reason I went with the .375 Ruger over the H&H is the rifles it is offered in.
To me the 1-H and the MK II magnum are better suited to the .410/.411, .416 and .458 cartridges.
I think the 1-S and the MK II standard are a better fit for a .375, and if you want a .375 in those rifles, it's a .375 Ruger.
I didn't have the rifle in time for moose last fall, but I took a couple of whitetails with it.
I used 225gr Hornady IL's at 2700 fps, which pretty much duplicates the 150 gr IL from a .308 win, just with a little more girth. SD and BC are almost identical.
Recoil is mild and on whitetail performance was great.
This coming fall I'll be using it for moose with 260 gr Accubonds at about 2800 fps.
To me the 1-H and the MK II magnum are better suited to the .410/.411, .416 and .458 cartridges.
I think the 1-S and the MK II standard are a better fit for a .375, and if you want a .375 in those rifles, it's a .375 Ruger.
I didn't have the rifle in time for moose last fall, but I took a couple of whitetails with it.
I used 225gr Hornady IL's at 2700 fps, which pretty much duplicates the 150 gr IL from a .308 win, just with a little more girth. SD and BC are almost identical.
Recoil is mild and on whitetail performance was great.
This coming fall I'll be using it for moose with 260 gr Accubonds at about 2800 fps.


















































