Interesting... so the effective 0.1" longer barrel of the 357 would possibly increase velocity and thus power.
On the other side of the coin, the 0.1" gap between where the .379 in diameter casing ends and the barrel sized for the .357 in bullet begins would possibly reduce gas pressure by allowing more space for the gas to occupy before reaching the throat.
Both of these possibly negated by the effects of the gap between the cylinder and the barrel.
I think we may indeed need to chronograph this. Anyone own both guns, a chronograph, and curious?
On the other side of the coin, the 0.1" gap between where the .379 in diameter casing ends and the barrel sized for the .357 in bullet begins would possibly reduce gas pressure by allowing more space for the gas to occupy before reaching the throat.
Both of these possibly negated by the effects of the gap between the cylinder and the barrel.
I think we may indeed need to chronograph this. Anyone own both guns, a chronograph, and curious?