For the money spent, I myself if I were you I'd would wait for a 44 or the 45 in this carbine.
Certainly the 357 is no slouch, but you'll get better use of the bigger ones for big game hunting IMO.
my two bits
I take down my Winchester all the time, remove the tang bolt and slide the butt stock
off, fits in a bag or good size pack.
yeah its just getting it in a takedown that is the main concern. I have a 45/70 lever for big stuff. The takedown is just for the pack if im shooting birds or small game way up north.
I agree with Brutus(well, sort of).
Find yourself a Marlin in .44 or 45 Colt, you will be a happy camper in the end
This 45 will never be sold or traded:
![]()
In a strong levergun, I would go for the .45 Colt if you plan to reload. The 3 cals. could be loaded to the same pressure levels in the same rifle/action, if you are not planning to reload, the .44 mag. would be the best choice. My tests with a 340gr. WFN Gc hardcast bullet show some real knockdown on heavy steel targets. Without the use of similar heavy flatpoint bullets in the .45, I would opt for the .44 mag. with 300+grain bullets.
45 Colt if you handload, 44 Magnum if you are going to use factory.
I take down my Winchester all the time, remove the tang bolt and slide the butt stock
off, fits in a bag or good size pack.
Just look for a Puma M92 in 454 Casull and the debate will be over...
Sorry no debate! They dont make it in .454 anymore![]()
Wayne how easy is it to remove the bolt? Do the threads or wood get weak or crimped over time if you keep taking off the stock?