I have a couple of .264WM's. While they are not target guns their, accuracy went down hill after 800-900 rounds or so. One which was CS has the barrel replaced and the other in SS lasted a little longer, but also needs a new barrel. It won't be another .264WM. They are barrel burners for sure.
This said, I find the reports on the 6.5x284 barrel life a bit pessimistic, especially if they are SS. I suspect some of it has to do with the subjectivity of what is burned out and what is not, as well as what accuracy is acceptable. A
forumula by Bart Bobbitt gives an expected accurate barrel life of about 3000 rounds for a .308 Win. Many will claim they get more and some less, but I think it is reasonably accepted.
For a .264WM it comes out with about 900 rounds which matches my experience fairly closely. So how does the .264WM compare to the 6.5x.284 for overbore capacity? The 6.5x.284 uses about 48 grains of H4831 behind a 140 grain while I use 62 grains. That is an increase of 30%, and a very significant difference. The Bobbitt formula gives it 1600 rounds.
I believe one strategy being used by long distance target shooters to get this full 1600 round life, is to run 800, and then set the chamber back, and run another 800.
Just my thoughts on it,