Both the .260 and 6.5x55 are DEATH ON WHEELS for deer, up to and including big ol' mulies, and they do a number on coyotes too. I've used these two calibers the last two years (with a gun safe full of real man's calibers, mind you...) and they leave nothing but lung soup and broken ribs behind.
I don't own a 7mm-08 but the ballistics are very impressive. Ackley speculated back in the 60s that the .308 'base' was about the ideal case capacity for the .284 bore. Looking at the 7mm-08 versus the .280 Rem and 7mm Mag I'd say he's probably right, or pretty close. You have to put in a lot more powder to get performance gains that are worth worrying about.
For up to medium game the .260 and 6.5x55 are hard to beat. You can handload them to nearly identical specs but as loaded by the big North American companies, the .260 has it over the 6.5 by at least a coupla hundred fps, due to higher pressure.
The .264 Mag is much like a .270 Win, except it burns tons more powder and you have to handload it. And it can be difficult to find an accurate load. And the throat will burn out after 500 rounds. Other than that, great cartridge.
I don't own a 7mm-08 but the ballistics are very impressive. Ackley speculated back in the 60s that the .308 'base' was about the ideal case capacity for the .284 bore. Looking at the 7mm-08 versus the .280 Rem and 7mm Mag I'd say he's probably right, or pretty close. You have to put in a lot more powder to get performance gains that are worth worrying about.
For up to medium game the .260 and 6.5x55 are hard to beat. You can handload them to nearly identical specs but as loaded by the big North American companies, the .260 has it over the 6.5 by at least a coupla hundred fps, due to higher pressure.
The .264 Mag is much like a .270 Win, except it burns tons more powder and you have to handload it. And it can be difficult to find an accurate load. And the throat will burn out after 500 rounds. Other than that, great cartridge.





















































